A What are the unusual absorption features observed in the EIT signal of 85Rb gas?

wangvivi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
recently,I am doing some experiments about electromagnetic induced transparency in the rubidium gas.Comparing the signal with pump light and no pump light, i noticed that there are two strange absorption in the situation of no pump light.
Hello,everyone!
Recently i am doing an experiments about electromagnetic induced transparency in 85rubidum gas.
I have two light source,which use the polarization spectrom frequncy stablizaiton technology to make them stable.One is used for probing light,and the other one is used for coupling light.I will show you the polarization spectrom of rubidium85 below.and this picture is from[1].In this picture,the coupling light is stabilized in Fg=3 -- Fe=2(in blue),and the probing light is scanned in Fg=2--Fe=2,3(in red) with triangular wave.
1658392336617.png

As you can see,I try to built an EIT configuration of Lambda-type.I will show you the energy level diagram for the D1 line of 85Rb.and in this picture,I point out the coupling light and the probing light.
1658393030096.png

Also,I will show you my optical system below
1658393288015.png

Then,I collect the signal from the detector in two situations.one situation is collecting the EIT signal with coupling light,and the other one is without coupling light.I notice that there are two strange absorption on both sides of EIT signal,and i don‘t know what it is.I will show you this signal below.
1658394271118.png


in this picture, the signal from detector without coupling light is in blue,and the signal with coupling light is in yellow.I also show the corresponding scanning polarization spectrom of 85Rb in Fg=2--Fe=2,3.
You can see from this picture,there are two abnormal absorption on both sides of EIT signal campared the signal without coupling light.can anybody tell me what it is?if you need any parameters like the width of these two signal,please don’t hesitate to contact me.or if you have some new thoughts about my experiment,please let me know.
Thank you all!
Hope you have a good day!

[1]Bin Wu,Yin Zhou,Kanxing Weng,et al.Modulation transpfer spetroscopy for D1 transition line of rubidium[J].Journal of the Optical Society of American B,2705-2710(2018)
 

Attachments

  • 1658392080940.png
    1658392080940.png
    13.4 KB · Views: 160
  • 1658394011437.png
    1658394011437.png
    21.8 KB · Views: 138
  • 1658394247872.png
    1658394247872.png
    23.3 KB · Views: 129
Physics news on Phys.org
1658395512154.png

I added this picture and you can see more details if you need.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top