(Sort of) Intermediate Value Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yagoda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem Value
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Yagoda
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that f is continuous on [a,b], its right-hand derivative [itex]f'_{+}(a)[/itex] exists, and [itex]\mu[/itex] is between [itex]f'_{+}(a)[/itex] and [itex]\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}[/itex]. Show that [itex]f(c) - f(a) = \mu (c-a)[/itex] for some [itex]c \in (a,b)[/itex].



Homework Equations


[itex]f'_{+}(a) = \lim_{x \rightarrow a^+}\frac{f(x)-f(a)}{x-a}[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution


I spent a little while trying to figure out exactly what I am trying to prove and it definitely makes sense now. Intuitively I can see that it is true. My first instinct was to use the IVT for derivatives or the MVT, but those both require that f be differentiable, which I don't know to be the case here.
So I looked at using the regular IVT, since it only requires that f be continuous on [a,b], but also needs f(a) not equal to f(b). I was going to for now ignore the case where f(a) = f(b), but I was having trouble showing that [itex]\mu[/itex] is between the required bounds.
Am I even on the right track or is there another approach that makes more sense?


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yagoda said:

Homework Statement


Suppose that f is continuous on [a,b], its right-hand derivative [itex]f'_{+}(a)[/itex] exists, and [itex]\mu[/itex] is between [itex]f'_{+}(a)[/itex] and [itex]\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}[/itex]. Show that [itex]f(c) - f(a) = \mu (c-a)[/itex] for some [itex]c \in (a,b)[/itex].



Homework Equations


[itex]f'_{+}(a) = \lim_{x \rightarrow a^+}\frac{f(x)-f(a)}{x-a}[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution


I spent a little while trying to figure out exactly what I am trying to prove and it definitely makes sense now. Intuitively I can see that it is true. My first instinct was to use the IVT for derivatives or the MVT, but those both require that f be differentiable, which I don't know to be the case here.
So I looked at using the regular IVT, since it only requires that f be continuous on [a,b], but also needs f(a) not equal to f(b). I was going to for now ignore the case where f(a) = f(b), but I was having trouble showing that [itex]\mu[/itex] is between the required bounds.
Am I even on the right track or is there another approach that makes more sense?


Thanks.

The question suggests that it would be worth considering
[tex]g(x) = \frac{f(x) - f(a)}{x - a}[/tex]
which is certainly defined and continuous for [itex]a < x \leq b[/itex]. Since [itex]f'_{+}(a)[/itex] exists we can make [itex]g[/itex] continuous at [itex]x = a[/itex] by setting [itex]g(a) = f'_{+}(a)[/itex].

Now [itex]g[/itex] is continuous on [itex][a,b][/itex] and you can apply the IVT.