Sound waves - Destructive Interference

[Saitama]

Homework Statement

Two identical loudspeakers are located at points A & B, 2m apart. The loudspeakers are driven by the same amplifier (coherent and are in the same phase). A small detector is moved out from point B along a line perpendicular to the line connecting A & B. Taking speed of sound in air as 332 m/s, find the frequency below which there will be no position along the line BC at which destructive interference occurs.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I am not sure how would I approach this problem. I started with calculating the path difference when the detector is at a distance x from its initial position,
\Delta x=\sqrt{4+x^2}-x
For destructive interference,
\sqrt{4+x^2}-x=\left(n+\frac{1}{2} \right)\lambda
where $\lambda$ is the wavelength of the wave.

I don't know how should I proceed from here.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

 

[ehild]

Think:
What does lowest frequency mean for the wavelength?
How does the pathlength - difference change if the detector moves along x?

ehild

 

[Saitama]

Think:
What does lowest frequency mean for the wavelength?
How does the pathlength - difference change if the detector moves along x?

ehild

Lowest frequency means highest wavelength. For that should I substitute n=0? And then I will get $\lambda$ as a function of x. So should I find maximum of this function?

 

[ehild]

Yes, do it...

ehild

 

[Saitama]

Yes, do it...

ehild

I tried that but had no luck. Substituting n=0,
\lambda=2(\sqrt{4+x^2}-x)
Differentiating w..r.t x
\frac{d\lambda}{dx}=2(\frac{x}{\sqrt{4+x^2}}-1)=0
This equation has no solution for x. :(

EDIT: Looks like the function has its maximum value at x=0. And this gives me the right answer. Thanks ehild!

 

[ehild]

There is no local maximum, but the function decreases with x, and x≥0. The function takes the maximum at the boundary.

ehild

 

[Saitama]

There is no local maximum, but the function decreases with x, and x≥0. The function takes the maximum at the boundary.

ehild

Yes I realized it when I examined the derivative. :)