Source of Heavier than Iron Nucleosynthesis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nucleosynthesis of heavier than iron elements, specifically comparing the contributions of supernovae and neutron star (NS) collisions. Recent evidence from the neutron star merger GW170817 indicates that approximately 10% of the matter ejected from binary neutron star (BNS) mergers is converted to r-process elements, potentially accounting for the observed r-process material in the Milky Way. However, the debate regarding the relative contributions of supernovae versus NS mergers to r-process material remains unresolved, as highlighted in the referenced slides from Princeton University.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nucleosynthesis processes
  • Familiarity with r-process elements
  • Knowledge of neutron star physics
  • Awareness of supernova mechanisms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the r-process nucleosynthesis in detail
  • Study the implications of the GW170817 neutron star merger
  • Examine the role of supernovae in heavy element production
  • Explore the latest findings in astrophysical journals regarding cosmic nucleosynthesis
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students interested in cosmic nucleosynthesis and the origins of heavy elements in the universe.

SciencewithDrJ
About 10 days ago, I read this in the Nature journal:

http://www.nature.com/news/collidin...mysteries-1.22829?WT.ec_id=NEWSDAILY-20171016

I quote: "Over the past decade or so, astrophysicists had come to believe that this was the most plausible mechanism to explain the abundance of the heavier elements of the periodic table1. "

Which is a more significant contributor to the nucleosynthesis of heavier than iron elements: supernovae or neutron star collisions? Any evidence available on this?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think your question is still being debated. http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~burrows/classes/541/r-process is a nice set of slides outlining the issues. The fact that we saw evidence of these heavy elements being produced in the recent neutron star merger says that these elements are produced from decompressed neutron star material. And for the first time we were able to measure how much material is ejected. Quoting from this paper, they say,
"We find that if ~10% of the matter dynamically ejected from BNS mergers is converted to r-process elements, GW170817-like BNS mergers could fully account for the amount of r-process material observed in the Milky Way"

But I think your question of how much of the r-process material comes from supernovae and how much from NS mergers is still open.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU and SciencewithDrJ
phyzguy said:
I think your question is still being debated. http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~burrows/classes/541/r-process is a nice set of slides outlining the issues. The fact that we saw evidence of these heavy elements being produced in the recent neutron star merger says that these elements are produced from decompressed neutron star material. And for the first time we were able to measure how much material is ejected. Quoting from this paper, they say,
"We find that if ~10% of the matter dynamically ejected from BNS mergers is converted to r-process elements, GW170817-like BNS mergers could fully account for the amount of r-process material observed in the Milky Way"

But I think your question of how much of the r-process material comes from supernovae and how much from NS mergers is still open.

Excellent feedback, thank you for this valuable input.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K