Space as a vacuum and earth's atmosphere

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion explores the nature of space as a vacuum and the mechanisms that allow Earth's atmosphere to exist despite the dispersive tendencies of gases in a vacuum. Participants examine the role of gravity in retaining atmospheric gases and the implications of atmospheric pressure and gas accumulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that gravity is the primary force that allows Earth to retain its atmosphere, with heavier planets like Jupiter and Saturn being able to hold lighter gases due to their greater mass.
  • Others question why gases are not more compressed and whether the atmosphere is continually growing due to gravity pulling in more gas molecules.
  • One participant suggests that while gravity slows the escape of gases, it does not significantly draw in new gases, as there is little free gas left in the solar system.
  • Another participant notes that the mass of the atmosphere is negligible compared to the planet's mass, which complicates the understanding of gravitational effects on gas retention.
  • A later reply summarizes that the solar system's formation is largely complete, with minimal new material available to contribute to the atmosphere, and that atmospheric balance is maintained by gravity and diffusion pressure.
  • One participant presents a personal theory suggesting that gravity causes the universe to expand, introducing a speculative view on the relationship between gravity, space, and atmospheric dynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the mechanisms of atmospheric retention and the role of gravity, with no consensus reached on the specifics of gas behavior in relation to gravity and vacuum dynamics.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the nature of gases, gravity, and the formation of the solar system, with some participants expressing confusion about the interplay of these factors. There are unresolved questions regarding the dynamics of gas compression and atmospheric pressure.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring concepts in astrophysics, atmospheric science, and the fundamental principles of gravity and gas behavior in space.

Leonidas
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Awesome web site, but its mostly over my head... with my physics expirence limited to high school.

I have always wondered this... if space is a vacuum... and gasses in a vacuum tend to ... uh... for a lack of a vocabulary... de-concentrate... disperse... what causes Earth's gases to stay where they are?

is it merely gravity overcoming the vacuum? if so... then how would it ever begin? with everything naturally attempting to be as-spread-out-as-possible... then how would masses large enough to have enough gravity to influence other particles form?

inform my ignorance, please.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes, it's gravity. The planets began as a gravitating concentration of dust in the wider dust cloud that became the solar system. Depending on their masses, they were able to trap some of the gasses that were mixed in with the dust; the heaviest clots, which were to become Jupiter and Saturn, were able to retain the lightest, and therefore fastest, gas molecules, Hyrogen and Helium. Somewhat heavy planets like the Earth and Venus were able to retain gasses like oxygen and nitrogen, and water (H2O, molecular weight 18). Mars apparently retained water for a long time, but due to lower mass, lost it at a greater rate than Earth, and now only retains carbon dioxide (CO2, molecular weight 44).
 
so... if its gravity... then... I'm not really sure how to phrase this... why aren't the gasses as compressed as possible?

also... doesn't that mean that the pressure within the Earth's atmosphere continually rises as more and more gasses slowly accumulate as the pull (Push? don't understand how that works either) of gravity brings more molecules of gasses into earth... or does the Earth's atmostphere slowly grow outwards?
 
The gravity of the planets is not strong enough to "suck in" new gasses, not is there any significant free gas left to suck in. What the gravity does is to slow down the escape of gasses. But even today a few molecules are always getting up to escape velocity due to collisions and, well, escaping.

As to the compression, gravity is a finite force, and gases have a definite weight. The weight of a column of air one square inch in cross section and as high as the atmosphere is about 14.7. pounds. That's what presses on you all the time, although it varies a bit with the weather (hence barometers).
 
i'm not sure i understand this...


the added mass of the gass would cause our gravitational pull to be stronger, not weaker, right? so... if we were able to suck in little bits of gas in the first place... and we have a stronger force of gravity now... why can't we do it now?

I get so confused...
 
Because there is no material to suck in at a significant amount. The solar system has formed. There aren't huge of dust and gases for our planet to collect anymore. So the atmosphere we have is either drifting off to space or being slowly added to as with volcanoes, which output gases that are locked within the earth.
 
Leonidas said:
the added mass of the gass would cause our gravitational pull to be stronger, not weaker, right?
While factually true, you may as well ignore it because the mass of our atmosphere is utterly insignificant when compared to the mass of the planet itself.
 
Leonidas said:
I get so confused...

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Don't be shy about asking for clarification even if many discussions here are complicated. We're happy to discuss any aspect of astronomy.
 
Last edited:
Leonidas said:
the added mass of the gass would cause our gravitational pull to be stronger, not weaker, right? so... if we were able to suck in little bits of gas in the first place... and we have a stronger force of gravity now... why can't we do it now?

Piecing together the above responses...
(1) The solar system formed from a disperse cloud of material.
(2) Gravity pulled the material together to form the sun & planets.
(3) That formation process is pretty much complete and there's not much free material left in this solar system to add anything significant to the Earth. We still get a daily dose of space dust & particles from the sun as well as the occasional asteroid/comet impact, but the additions are small compared to the whole Earth, so the gravity increase is very small.
(4) Over time, some light, fast moving atoms in the atmosphere (like hydrogen) do escape out into space.
(5) Our atmosphere is the result of the balancing act between the Earth's gravity pulling matter downwards and the outward "diffusion pressure" you're asking about. If Earth's gravity were much higher, then the atmosphere we have would be compressed more.
 
  • #10
My theory here:

Gravity is the force causing the universe to expand. For some reason all the planets and debres and everything moving in space(and time)casue an indentation in space and time, sending somewhat of a wave through space, arcing, and hittig the ends of the univers, over millions and millions and billions of light years, pushing it, and forcing it to expand. Space is full of matter, and at the ends of the univers, there "is no matter" so law of equillibreum must come into play where the huge vaccume of space is succing in all the emptyness, thus making it bigger, EXPANDING, and whatever is outside space, decrease... or something, someone please inform me!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K