Space Debris Removal: Where to Publish Idea?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Eagle9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and considerations of publishing an idea related to space debris removal using a space elevator. Participants explore the publication process, the viability of the idea, and the types of journals that might accept submissions from amateurs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to publish an idea about using a space elevator for space debris removal and seeks recommendations for suitable journals.
  • Some participants suggest that it may be difficult for an amateur to find a journal willing to publish such ideas, citing the high standards and expectations of peer-reviewed publications.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality of the idea, with some arguing that discussing applications of a space elevator is premature if the technology itself is not yet feasible.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of informal discussions and feedback among peers before attempting to publish new ideas, noting that journal articles are not the primary means of scientific communication in astrophysics.
  • There is a suggestion that ideas for economically building a space elevator might be more appealing than ideas for its application.
  • One participant acknowledges the challenges of publishing in less-known journals and seeks specific recommendations for journals that focus on techniques and technologies rather than pure science.
  • Several participants discuss the notion that producing plans for future technologies, like a space elevator, may not be seen as worthwhile if the foundational technology is not yet developed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express skepticism about the feasibility of publishing the idea as it stands, and there is no consensus on the best approach to take or the likelihood of acceptance by journals. Multiple competing views on the publication process and the practicality of the idea remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of the publication process for new ideas, including the need for informal feedback and the challenges faced by amateurs in gaining acceptance in scientific journals.

Eagle9
Messages
238
Reaction score
10
Good day! I hope I posted this information in the suitable thread :smile: Recently I have developed one idea regarding removing the space debris by means of Space Elevator and I would like to publish it somewhere. Could you please indicate me relevant journals about space activities that would publish the papers from amateurs?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If its from an amateur, and about a space-elevator---nothing good will publish it.
 
While I commend you for insight into this problem of space junk, it is highly unlikely you will find your paper published. You can of course, submit it to any space related journal, then wait for their feedback. You may have a very good idea, but the idea may have many reasons {cost for one} which would make it impossible.
Make sure to include a self addressed, stamped envelope.
 
An idea for how to economically build a space elevator would be more appealing than ways to use it.
 
hypatia
While I commend you for insight into this problem of space junk, it is highly unlikely you will find your paper published. You can of course, submit it to any space related journal, then wait for their feedback. You may have a very good idea, but the idea may have many reasons {cost for one} which would make it impossible.
Well, do you know such space related journals? I would try to submit my paper….
Make sure to include a self addressed, stamped envelope.
Will not they accept the paper via email? :rolleyes:


Chronos
An idea for how to economically build a space elevator would be more appealing than ways to use it.
Maybe :smile: but still, I need to find such journals and try, perhaps they will accept new idea, even not completely developed in technical sense…
 
Last edited:
Also, I think you need to understand the publication process. When some physicist has a new idea, it takes a lot of effort to get it into a form in which it is publishable. The first thing said physicist will do is to bounce the idea around his friends at lunch, and then maybe do a conference presentation.

One other thing is that referred journal articles are *terrible* forums for dealing with truly new ideas (partly because most new ideas are bad ideas), and professionals don't send their latest and greatest ideas to peer-reviewed journals. They talk about their ideas over lunch, and it's only after they get positive informal feedback that they'll try to publish.

You should also know that in astrophysics, journal articles are not the primary method of scientific communication. They are useful to make sure that stuff doesn't get lost and for score keeping, but with some uncommon exceptions (WMAP results), people don't get their information from journals.
 
twofish-quant
Also, I think you need to understand the publication process. When some physicist has a new idea, it takes a lot of effort to get it into a form in which it is publishable. The first thing said physicist will do is to bounce the idea around his friends at lunch, and then maybe do a conference presentation.

One other thing is that referred journal articles are *terrible* forums for dealing with truly new ideas (partly because most new ideas are bad ideas), and professionals don't send their latest and greatest ideas to peer-reviewed journals. They talk about their ideas over lunch, and it's only after they get positive informal feedback that they'll try to publish.

You should also know that in astrophysics, journal articles are not the primary method of scientific communication. They are useful to make sure that stuff doesn't get lost and for score keeping, but with some uncommon exceptions (WMAP results), people don't get their information from journals.
All there are right, but I am not Physicist and I do not have any other way but journals only :smile: actually I am not seeking the best-known journals, I would be satisfied with publishing my paper in less-known journal :smile: do you know some of them?

russ_watters
Thanks, but I need the journals about techniques/technologies and not pure science :rolleyes:
 
Doesn't producing a "way to use a space elevator" when we don't have space elevators seem like you're putting the cart before the horse?

Perhaps your idea is brilliant, but I don't think anyone will touch it so long as it is practically impossible.
 
  • #10
JaredJames
Doesn't producing a "way to use a space elevator" when we don't have space elevators seem like you're putting the cart before the horse?
Maybe I am putting the cart before the horse, this happens in theory when somebody invents something new that will be used in practice in far future :smile:

Perhaps your idea is brilliant, but I don't think anyone will touch it so long as it is practically impossible.
But the Space Elevator also is impossible to build now, however many articles were written about it :rolleyes:
 
  • #11
Eagle9 said:
Maybe I am putting the cart before the horse, this happens in theory when somebody invents something new that will be used in practice in far future

But the Space Elevator also is impossible to build now, however many articles were written about it

Assuming we ever build one - it's only feasible if that hurdle is passed.

You have to realize that, although not as extreme, it's like producing a plan for things to do once we have an FTL capable ship. People don't see it as something worthwhile and it's difficult to get traction with it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K