Spacetime definition in philosophy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the definition and conceptual understanding of spacetime, particularly from a philosophical perspective. Participants explore the nature of spacetime as it relates to physical reality, mathematical representations, and the implications of various scientific theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Philosophical inquiry

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a tangible definition of spacetime, emphasizing its physical properties and effects, and questions the philosophical interpretations of it.
  • Another participant references Einstein's views, suggesting he did not conceptualize spacetime as something that can be physically manipulated like a fabric.
  • Several participants discuss analogies, such as a 3D grid to visualize spacetime, but question the reality of these representations and what is actually being distorted by gravity.
  • One participant expresses frustration with the complexity of the mathematics involved in understanding spacetime and suggests that some aspects may never be fully understood.
  • A participant introduces the concept of "theory-laden" terms, indicating that the meaning of spacetime is influenced by the scientific theories from which it arises.
  • Another participant acknowledges the philosophical aspects of spacetime and expresses a desire to explore related theories like String Theory and Loop Quantum Gravity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definition or nature of spacetime. There are multiple competing views on its physicality, representation, and philosophical implications, indicating an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of mathematical descriptions in capturing the essence of spacetime and express uncertainty about the fundamental nature of spacetime and gravity.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
i have been looking for a definition of spacetime, not
something described by pure mathematics, but the real
world space time that has some tangibility, the one
that can be bent, twisted ,and have effects on time,
the fabric of spacetime, relativity, QLG, string, all
give different answers, so what if anything does
philosophy say?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Well, as you can see from this post on the relativity forum, Einstein didn't regard spacetime as something to be rolled, folded or spindled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
so how would you explain to someone what "spacetime" is?
is it correct to say it is a physical entity?
some are of the opinion that
the "fabric of spacetime" can be distorted in many ways
without giving an explanation of what it is that is
being distorted.
 
Imagine a 3 dimensional grid, with a line for every million metres.

With no mass this grid is perfect, but enter a black hole and the grid appears to get denser around the black hole. The grid does not stretch, simply more lines enter the diagram. The black hole now looks like a white spot as there is an infinite amount of grid lines within.

This is how to 'imagine' space time.
 
Imagine a 3 dimensional grid, with a line for every million metres.

With no mass this grid is perfect, but enter a black hole and the grid appears to get denser around the black hole. The grid does not stretch, simply more lines enter the diagram. The black hole now looks like a white spot as there is an infinite amount of grid lines within.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
this is the general concept i understand, the thing i
do not is the "grid lines", in your analogy these lines
would be the "fabric", of spacetime another term used
is geometry, but geometry is a pure mathematical
conceptualization, these grid lines have no real existence,
so what is distorting in the presence of gravity?
 
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Well, as you can see from this post on the relativity forum, Einstein didn't regard spacetime as something to be rolled, folded or spindled.

Can it be stapled or mutilated? :wink:

This is a GOOD thread! When we're done with spacetime, may we approach the philosophical aspects of String/M-Theory and Loop Quantum Gravity? I'm almost bald (from hair pulling - now I know why Einstein's hair looked like it DID!) in my frustration with those!
 
first off, space and time are phenomenons (phenonmenae?) of the physical.

scientists and/or mathematicians need to have this 'fabric' in order to show how it can be bent, folded and spindled (a visual aid).

ironically, soon we will accept the fact that we can enter any point in that fabric whenever we want. all we need do is have a better understanding of our consciousness.

peace,
 
as far as i can make out theorists are still arguing
as to what spacetime is, the maths they use is
horrendous and can only be fully understood by the
people that do little else, but nature is not always
best described in mathematical terms, "try explaining
a color mathematically", the attempt to discover what
gravity is, is over one hundred years old now and
still far from being solved, maybe there is no
mathematical solution, may be spacetime and gravity
are so fundamental, "akin to asking who is god",
that we will never know the answers.
 
Hi wolram

Originally posted by wolram
i have been looking for a definition of spacetime

what if anything does
philosophy say?

I know this isn't precisely what you were asking for, but I think it will help you think about this. It has to do with a useful term that philosophers of science have come up with called "theory-laden". The idea is that scientific concepts necessarily derive their various meanings from the individual theories in which they arise. Thus spacetime is a theory-laden term whose significance thus depends on the status of a given theory. In fact, philosophers of science generally philosophize about concepts like spacetime from the perspective of specific scientific theories.
 
  • #10
I know this isn't precisely what you were asking for, but I think it will help you think about this. It has to do with a useful term that philosophers of science have come up with called "theory-laden". The idea is that scientific concepts necessarily derive their various meanings from the individual theories in which they arise. Thus spacetime is a theory-laden term whose significance thus depends on the status of a given theory. In fact, philosophers of science generally philosophize about concepts like spacetime from the perspective of specific scientific theories.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
thankyou for this, it is nice that you can take timeout
from somewhat heated discussion to philosophize
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K