MHB Sparkling's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a volume by slicing

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
AI Thread Summary
To find the volume of a solid with semicircular cross sections in the first quadrant, the diameter is determined by the equation D = 1/x. The volume of an individual slice is calculated as dV = (π/8)D² dx, leading to dV = (π/8)x⁻² dx. Integrating this from x = 1 to x = 4 gives the total volume V = (π/8)∫₁⁴ x⁻² dx. The final result is V = 3π/32, clarifying the discrepancy with the previously mentioned 3π/4.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

How to find the volume of a solid given an equation and bounds?

Let the first quadrant region enclosed by the graph of =1/x, x=1 and x=4 be the base of a solid. If cross sections perpendicular to the x-axis are semicircles, the volume of the solid is:

(Answer: 3pi/ 32)

Please tell me how you got the answer because I kept getting 3pi/4

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Sparkling,

The volume of an arbitrary semicircular slice is:

$$dV=\frac{\pi}{8}D^2\,dx$$

where the diameter $D$ is:

$$D=\frac{1}{x}$$

hence:

$$dV=\frac{\pi}{8}x^{-2}\,dx$$

And so, the sum of all the slices is given by:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{8}\int_1^4 x^{-2}\,dx$$

Applying the FTOC, we obtain:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{8}\left[-\frac{1}{x} \right]_1^4=\frac{\pi}{8}\left(1-\frac{1}{4} \right)=\frac{3\pi}{32}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top