Flat Donut Universes & Special Relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of a flat, toroidal universe and its implications under special relativity, specifically regarding inertial frames and the Lorentz transform. It concludes that such a universe does indeed possess a distinguished inertial frame where the loop-around distance is maximized due to the absence of length contraction. Participants referenced a previous thread discussing the twin paradox in a closed universe, which provided additional insights into the behavior of spacetime in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Basic knowledge of topology, specifically toroidal structures
  • Concept of inertial frames in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Lorentz transform in non-standard geometries
  • Explore the twin paradox in closed universes
  • Study the properties of flat and toroidal universes in cosmology
  • Investigate time dilation effects in various inertial frames
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the intersections of geometry and relativity, particularly in unconventional universe models.

Strilanc
Science Advisor
Messages
612
Reaction score
229
Suppose there was a universe that was small, and flat, but globally it was connected like a torus. Basically, pac-man's universe (except special relativity is in effect). The space ##(\mathbb{R} \pmod{1})^3##.

Does this assumed universe have a distinguished inertial frame where the loop-around-distance is maximized (due to not being length-contracted)? For example, if you pushed a small ball away from yourself along the x axis, can the amount of time until it smacks into your back depend on your velocity w.r.t. some frame? Or are the differences canceled out by time dilation? What if there was a clock on the ball?

(Obviously this question is about how the Lorentz transform behaves in unusual situations, not about how reality actually is.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Strilanc said:
Does this assumed universe have a distinguished inertial frame where the loop-around-distance is maximized (due to not being length-contracted)?
The short answer is yes.

We had a thread quite some time ago where we talked about this, but the thread is of rather poor quality due to some persistent off topic posts by one particular now-banned user. But here it is anyway: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/twin-paradox-in-a-closed-universe.375432/
 
Thanks, that answers my questions. I particularly liked the "only one frame's present lines up with itself, instead of making candy-cane strips across spacetime" for making it seem kinda obvious in hindsight.

(I also like how that thread links to another thread that links to another thread and so on for a decade.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K