Special Relativity Fiber Bundle: R^3 & Lorentz Metric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the representation of space-time in special relativity as a fiber bundle, where the base space is time and the fibers are represented by R^3, connected through the Lorentz metric. Participants clarify that while this structure is theoretically valid, it may not be practically useful due to the trivial nature of the bundle. The conversation also emphasizes the distinction between the metric and connection, highlighting that the connection in Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian spaces is defined by Christoffel symbols, which facilitate parallel transport of vectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fiber bundles in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with Lorentz metrics and their applications
  • Knowledge of Riemannian and pseudo-Riemannian spaces
  • Basic concepts of Christoffel symbols and covariant derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Differential Geometry" lecture notes available at this link
  • Research "Riemann Manifolds" and "Vector Bundles" using PDF search queries
  • Read the paper "Fibre bundles associated with space-time" by Andrzej Trautman, available at this link
  • Explore the five-part article "The Pantheon of Derivatives" on Physics Forums for foundational concepts
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students interested in the geometric interpretation of space-time in special relativity, particularly those studying fiber bundles and differential geometry.

Thytanium
Messages
43
Reaction score
18
TL;DR
I want to know if in special relativity, space-time as a fiber bundle, the base space is time and the fibers are R3 space.
In the space-time of special relativity considered as fiber bundle, could it be stated that the base space is time and the fibers are space ##R^3## related to each other by the Lorentz metric as a connection and in this case would there be parallelism, and in this case: how would this fiber space be represented geometrically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/galilean-spacetime-as-a-fiber-bundle.986579/post-6328519 ,
consult this paper by Trautman.:

http://trautman.fuw.edu.pl/publications/Papers-in-pdf/25.pdf
Fibre bundles associated with space-time, Rep. Math. Phys. (Torun) 1, 29–34 (1970)
from the site http://trautman.fuw.edu.pl/publications/scientific-articles.html .

(Hmm… not the reference I wanted… to be updated:
Better:

http://trautman.fuw.edu.pl/publications/Papers-in-pdf/30_Andrzej_Trautman.pdf
see p. 190
)Galilean and Newton-Cartan Spacetime have that kind of structure,
but not Minkowski and general-relativistic Spacetimes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby, otennert, PeroK and 4 others
robphy said:
From https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/galilean-spacetime-as-a-fiber-bundle.986579/post-6328519 ,
consult this paper by Trautman.:

http://trautman.fuw.edu.pl/publications/Papers-in-pdf/25.pdf
Fibre bundles associated with space-time, Rep. Math. Phys. (Torun) 1, 29–34 (1970)
from the site http://trautman.fuw.edu.pl/publications/scientific-articles.html .

(Hmm… not the reference I wanted… to be updated:
Better:

http://trautman.fuw.edu.pl/publications/Papers-in-pdf/30_Andrzej_Trautman.pdf
see p. 190
)Galilean and Newton-Cartan Spacetime have that kind of structure,
but not Minkowski and general-relativistic Spacetimes.
Thank you Robphy. Thank you for answering my question and clarifying my doubts. And thanks for the links.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Hello friends. Excuse me. I have been reading the links that Robphy sent me but I don't understand some concepts. Please, if you can recommend me some books on basic concepts of manifolds and fiber bundles for beginners that I can download for free from the web, I would appreciate it. And thanks you and sorry.
 
Thytanium said:
Hello friends. Excuse me. I have been reading the links that Robphy sent me but I don't understand some concepts. Please, if you can recommend me some books on basic concepts of manifolds and fiber bundles for beginners that I can download for free from the web, I would appreciate it. And thanks you and sorry.
You can start right here on PF:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/the-pantheon-of-derivatives-i/
is a five-part article that can give you an overview and has also a list of references (mostly books available at Amazon).

You will see, that it is not so easy to jump right in. You normally start with a course on ordinary Riemann manifolds. You can find lecture notes via the search keys:
Riemann Manifolds + pdf
Differential Geometry + pdf
Vector Bundles + pdf
possibly extended by + introduction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Spinnor, vanhees71 and Thytanium
fresh_42 said:
You can start right here on PF:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/the-pantheon-of-derivatives-i/
is a five-part article that can give you an overview and has also a list of references (mostly books available at Amazon).

You will see, that it is not so easy to jump right in. You normally start with a course on ordinary Riemann manifolds. You can find lecture notes via the search keys:
Riemann Manifolds + pdf
Differential Geometry + pdf
Vector Bundles + pdf
possibly extended by + introduction.
Thanks fresh_42. Grateful friend.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Thytanium said:
Thanks fresh_42. Grateful friend.
If you are looking for lecture notes, try to find those written by physics professors. Their treatment should be better suited in this case than the purely mathematical approach, e.g.
http://people.uncw.edu/lugo/COURSES/DiffGeom/DG1.pdf
looks good.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Thytanium
Thytanium said:
Summary: I want to know if in special relativity, space-time as a fiber bundle, the base space is time and the fibers are R3 space.

In the space-time of special relativity considered as fiber bundle, could it be stated that the base space is time and the fibers are space ##R^3##
Yes, but since it is a trivial bundle it may not be that useful. Also there isn't any preferred way to do that. That's the whole point of relativity.
Thytanium said:
related to each other by the Lorentz metric as a connection and in this case would there be parallelism, and in this case: how would this fiber space be represented geometrically?
This is hard to understand. The metric is not a connection. It would be better if you tried to rephrase it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Thytanium
fresh_42 said:
If you are looking for lecture notes, try to find those written by physics professors. Their treatment should be better suited in this case than the purely mathematical approach, e.g.
http://people.uncw.edu/lugo/COURSES/DiffGeom/DG1.pdf
looks good.
Hello friends fresh_42 and martinbn very grateful for your information. Wonderful differential geometry book you sent me. Thanks. Since yesterday I have had internet problems and i still have them. As for my question, I imagined the quadrivectors ##x^i##(x,y,z,ct) of the Minkowski space and its parallel transportation and thought the connection for that transport was the relation ##ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 - (ct)^2##. That is to say, make parallel transport of those vectors. That is what I thought. Thanks friends. Very thankful.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #10
A connection is something different. In a Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian space it's given by the Christoffel symbols, which are derivatives of the components of the metric (pseudo-metric). It defines covariant derivatives of tensor components and the parallel transport of vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Thytanium
  • #11
vanhees71 said:
A connection is something different. In a Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian space it's given by the Christoffel symbols, which are derivatives of the components of the metric (pseudo-metric). It defines covariant derivatives of tensor components and the parallel transport of vectors.
Thanks you vanhees71. You have clarified my doubts. Very grateful to you friend.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and malawi_glenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
867
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
972
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K