Special Relativity: Time Dilation Explained

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concept of time dilation in special relativity, particularly illustrated through a scenario involving two objects: one stationary and the other moving at 99% the speed of light. It is established that both observers will perceive the other's clock as moving slower while in motion, and only upon reunion can the differential aging be compared. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding proper time and the Twin Paradox, which clarifies the nuances of comparing clocks in different states of motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of proper time
  • Knowledge of the Twin Paradox
  • Basic grasp of relativistic effects at high speeds
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Twin Paradox and its implications in special relativity
  • Study the mathematical formulation of time dilation
  • Explore the concept of proper time in detail
  • Investigate the effects of acceleration on time perception in relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching special relativity, and anyone interested in the implications of high-speed travel on time perception.

mpolo
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
I am trying to get this idea of Time dilation understood.

If there exists only two objects in a Universe and one object is stationary and the other object is moving at 99 % the speed of light. Their clocks were both synchronized when both objects were stationary relative to each other. Then the second object instantaneously accelerated to 99 percent speed of light. I believe that the person located in the speeding object would see his clock moving normally and would not see that it is moving slower than the person in the object that is stationary. Let us say this speeding object person then moves at 99 % speed of light for 10 minutes and then instantaneously stops and checks his clock. Will the fast moving person's clock have lost some time and moved slower than the person in the stationary object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mpolo said:
I am trying to get this idea of Time dilation understood.

If there exists only two objects in a Universe and one object is stationary and the other object is moving at 99 % the speed of light. Their clocks were both synchronized when both objects were stationary relative to each other. Then the second object instantaneously accelerated to 99 percent speed of light. I believe that the person located in the speeding object would see his clock moving normally and would not see that it is moving slower than the person in the object that is stationary. Let us say this speeding object person then moves at 99 % speed of light for 10 minutes and then instantaneously stops and checks his clock. Will the fast moving person's clock have lost some time and moved slower than the person in the stationary object?
There is no such thing as "stationary" or "moving" except as relates to a reference object, so your scenario is confused. If two objects start out next to each other and stationary relative to each other and the one of them fires a rocket and moves away, they will BOTH see the other's clock as moving slow (as long as the motion is going on) and their own moving normally. Only if you bring them back together can you compare the differential aging. Differential aging is different from time dilation in that time dilation is just something that happens to an object you are observing, never to you but differential aging is a real difference in age. Google the Twin Paradox.
 
To answer that question properly, one needs to consider how one comparses two clocks that are not at the same location. One can describe the details of this process, and perhaps at some point this will become necessary, but it may be premature to do this at the current time. The two points I'd like to make are these. The first point is that this process of comparing clocks that are not at the same place has some subtle aspects in special relativity that are not immediately obvious, enough that it merits a discussion of its own. The second point is that there is a simple modification of your question that eliminates the immediate need to be address this issue of how to compare clocks at different locations.

The modification consists of having one clock stay at rest, and having the other clock accelerate (instantaneously, if you like, or over some finite time period , it makes no difference). This clock then it travels for a while, and it accelerates in the opposite direction, so that it heads back towards the first clock. When it reaches the original clock, it accelerates for a third time and stops. This whole procedure has a name, it's called "the Twin paradox". Whether or not more objects than these two clocks exist in the universe is basically irrelevant. If adding additional objects helps you to understand how it all works, by all means, add more objects to the universe to help figure out what is happening.

Now we can compare the two clocks, which are side by side (so we have no need of answering the first question) When we do this, we find that the two clocks have different readings.

As an aside, the name we give to the concept of time that excludes comparing clocks at different locations is called "proper time". You'll find a lot of threads on this topic, some of which are perhaps overly long.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
mpolo said:
If there exists only two objects in a Universe and one object is stationary and the other object is moving at 99 % the speed of light.

If Object A is at rest and Object B is moving relative to it at a speed of ##0.99\ c## then it's equally valid to say that B is at rest and A is moving relative to it at a speed of ##0.99\ c##. The only difference is the observer's state of motion. If he's co-moving with A then A is at rest, if he's co-moving with B then B is at rest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
928
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K