Spectrophotometry question - anyone experienced with it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter omgwtfitsp
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the equilibrium concentration of the complex ion FeSCN2+ in a reaction involving Fe3+ and SCN-. The experimenter graphed a calibration curve and calculated equilibrium constants for various trials with differing volumes of SCN-. The results indicated that while most trials yielded similar equilibrium constants, the trial with the lowest volume of SCN- produced a higher constant. The discussion highlights the importance of recalculating absorbance when adjusting volumes in spectrophotometric measurements to ensure accurate concentration readings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with spectrophotometry techniques
  • Knowledge of absorbance-concentration relationships
  • Experience with calibration curves in analytical chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of chemical equilibrium and Le Chatelier's principle
  • Learn about spectrophotometric methods for measuring absorbance
  • Study the calculation of equilibrium constants in chemical reactions
  • Explore methods for minimizing experimental error in spectrophotometry
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, laboratory technicians, and researchers involved in analytical chemistry and spectrophotometric analysis.

omgwtfitsp
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I'm doing an experiment trying to find the equilibrium concentration for the reaction:

Fe 3+ + SCN- = FeSC 2+

So now, I have already graph the calibration curve and found the constant for absorption and concentration.

This next part of the experiment we use a constant volume of Fe 3+ but change the volume of SCN -

So I have to find the equilibrium concentration for the product (FeSCN 2+) for each trial of different volumes.

So would we expect the equilibrium to be the same for all the trials with the different volumes one of the reactant or should they be different?

Because when I calculated the equilibrium constant for each trial, they all roughly came to about the same number, off by a bit here and there. Except for the first test tube that had the lowest volume of one of the manipulated reactant, this trial had a higher constant than the others.

I'm not familiar so much with spectrophotometry, so is there some experimental error that is associated with this device?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Not sure exactly what data you have, but absorbance is directly related to concentration of the complexed iron. You can recalculate the absorbance for constant volume. In other words, if you are adding volume increments of your ligand solution then you are increasing the volume of your resulting solution of the the complex. If you were adding only the ligand without its amount of volume of solvent, then your absorbance would be higher. In reality, you will include solvent WITH the added ligand, therefore, you should make a recalculation of absorbance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K