Speed of light in intergalactic space

In summary: So it's not really accurate to say light is slower in a vacuum at 2.7K, it's just that certain experiments involving light can be affected by the environment in which they are conducted. The speed of light in a vacuum is still the universal speed limit.In summary, the speed of light is constant and does not depend on temperature. While the properties of matter can affect how light is transmitted, a vacuum does not have a temperature and therefore does not impact the speed of light. Experiments that involve light may be affected by the environment in which they are conducted, but the speed of light in a vacuum remains the universal speed limit.
  • #1
foxpoint11
3
0
What is the speed of light at 2.7 degrees K.If it`s less than C,you know what my next question is.
Empty space is not empty i am told, so we don`t have the classical definition of a vacuum so photons
are passing through something that should slow the photons down?
At cryogenic temperatures on earth,photons are as slow as or slower than photons through water.
Any clarification would be helpful.
foxpoint11:confused:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
foxpoint11 said:
What is the speed of light at 2.7 degrees K.
The temperature of space isn't 2.7K, that's the temperature of the microwave background and so the lowest temperature any material sitting in space can reach in equilibrium.
But more importantly the temperature doesn't affect the speed of light.

are passing through something that should slow the photons down?
Yes if there is any material in the empty space than some of the light will be slowed down by interaction with any gas/dust present.
But it doesn't interact with the empty space - virtual photon pairs and quantum vacuum fluctuations don't give space a refractive index.

At cryogenic temperatures on earth,photons are as slow as or slower than photons through water.
That's a function of the material the ligth is passing through, it's not fundamentally because the material is cold. The cold is just necessary to get the material in the right energy state.
 
  • #3
Welcome to PF.

The speed of light in a vacuum, in an inertial (non-accelerating) reference frame is C. Period. Nothing more to say. So you can reference every question you ask back to that reality.

2.7 K is a temperature, not a substance/medium, so I'm not sure what you think it has to do with this issue, but it sounds like you mistakenly think there is a connection. Photons aren't matter. They don't have a temperature except insofar as their frequency can tell you the temperature of the source. So the "at cryogenic temperatures on earth, photons are as slow as or slower than photons through water" isn't just wrong, it's meaningless. It's like saying 'my favorite color is 'car'.'
 
  • #4
russ_watters said:
So the "at cryogenic temperatures on earth, photons are as slow as or slower than photons through water" isn't just wrong, it's meaningless.
To the OP, the speed of light in a material depends on the atomic structure of the material. In air it's very nearly the same as C, in water it's 75% C in diamond it's slowed to 40% of C.

There are techniques to slow light down to very low speeds, approx 10 billionths of c.
To do this you need some matter in a very weird state - this is only possible at very very low temperatures.
If the popular account emphasizes the very low temperature (because this is the experimental challenge) you could get the idea that this is what causes the light to slow down.
 
  • #5
russ_watters said:
Welcome to PF.

2.7 K is a temperature, not a substance/medium, so I'm not sure what you think it has to do with this issue, but it sounds like you mistakenly think there is a connection. Photons aren't matter. '

Light travels at extremely slow speed at absolute zero.

Light acts like a particle as well as a wave. It's not matter, however experiments prove that like acts much the same way.
 
  • #6
nkt said:
Light travels at extremely slow speed at absolute zero.

Light acts like a particle as well as a wave. It's not matter, however experiments prove that like acts much the same way.

The speed of light does not depend on the temperature. The properties of matter do however, and the properties of matter do determine how light is transmitted.

For the 3rd time from a 3rd person temperature has no direct effect on the speed of light.
 
  • #7
My bad, i thought the experiment was done through a vacuum.
 
  • #8
Just to add another point, remember that a vacuum doesn't have a temperature. Temperature is a measure of the kinetic energy of particles, in a vacuum, where there are no particles, there is not such thing as a temperature.
 

What is the speed of light in intergalactic space?

The speed of light in intergalactic space is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. This is the fastest speed at which anything can travel in the universe.

Why is the speed of light important in intergalactic space?

The speed of light is important in intergalactic space because it is the maximum speed at which information can be transmitted, and it plays a crucial role in understanding the laws of the universe.

How is the speed of light in intergalactic space measured?

The speed of light in intergalactic space can be measured using a variety of methods, including observing the redshift of distant objects, using satellite measurements, and using the cosmological constant.

Has the speed of light in intergalactic space always been constant?

According to the theory of relativity, the speed of light in intergalactic space has always been constant. However, some theories suggest that it may have been different in the early stages of the universe.

What are the implications of the speed of light in intergalactic space for space travel?

The speed of light in intergalactic space poses a major challenge for space travel, as it is currently impossible for any object to travel at this speed. This means that intergalactic travel will require innovative solutions and technologies in order to overcome this limitation.

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
474
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top