Speed of light in intergalactic space

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the speed of light in intergalactic space, particularly in relation to the temperature of space at 2.7 degrees Kelvin. Participants explore the implications of temperature on the speed of light, the nature of vacuum, and the behavior of photons in different media.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the speed of light is affected by the temperature of space, specifically at 2.7 K, suggesting that empty space may not be truly empty and could slow photons down.
  • Others clarify that the temperature of space does not affect the speed of light, emphasizing that the speed of light in a vacuum remains constant at C, regardless of temperature.
  • There is a discussion about how light behaves in different materials, with some participants noting that the speed of light can be significantly reduced in certain media, but this is not directly related to temperature.
  • One participant mentions that light can be slowed down in specific conditions involving matter at very low temperatures, but this is a distinct scenario from the speed of light in a vacuum.
  • Some participants assert that photons do not have a temperature and that temperature is a measure of kinetic energy in particles, which does not apply in a vacuum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the relationship between temperature and the speed of light, with some asserting that temperature has no direct effect while others suggest that the conditions of space could influence light's behavior. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of temperature on the speed of light in various contexts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about the nature of vacuum and the definitions of temperature in relation to light. Some claims about the behavior of light in different media and under varying conditions are not fully explored or clarified.

foxpoint11
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
What is the speed of light at 2.7 degrees K.If it`s less than C,you know what my next question is.
Empty space is not empty i am told, so we don`t have the classical definition of a vacuum so photons
are passing through something that should slow the photons down?
At cryogenic temperatures on earth,photons are as slow as or slower than photons through water.
Any clarification would be helpful.
foxpoint11:confused:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
foxpoint11 said:
What is the speed of light at 2.7 degrees K.
The temperature of space isn't 2.7K, that's the temperature of the microwave background and so the lowest temperature any material sitting in space can reach in equilibrium.
But more importantly the temperature doesn't affect the speed of light.

are passing through something that should slow the photons down?
Yes if there is any material in the empty space than some of the light will be slowed down by interaction with any gas/dust present.
But it doesn't interact with the empty space - virtual photon pairs and quantum vacuum fluctuations don't give space a refractive index.

At cryogenic temperatures on earth,photons are as slow as or slower than photons through water.
That's a function of the material the ligth is passing through, it's not fundamentally because the material is cold. The cold is just necessary to get the material in the right energy state.
 
Welcome to PF.

The speed of light in a vacuum, in an inertial (non-accelerating) reference frame is C. Period. Nothing more to say. So you can reference every question you ask back to that reality.

2.7 K is a temperature, not a substance/medium, so I'm not sure what you think it has to do with this issue, but it sounds like you mistakenly think there is a connection. Photons aren't matter. They don't have a temperature except insofar as their frequency can tell you the temperature of the source. So the "at cryogenic temperatures on earth, photons are as slow as or slower than photons through water" isn't just wrong, it's meaningless. It's like saying 'my favorite color is 'car'.'
 
russ_watters said:
So the "at cryogenic temperatures on earth, photons are as slow as or slower than photons through water" isn't just wrong, it's meaningless.
To the OP, the speed of light in a material depends on the atomic structure of the material. In air it's very nearly the same as C, in water it's 75% C in diamond it's slowed to 40% of C.

There are techniques to slow light down to very low speeds, approx 10 billionths of c.
To do this you need some matter in a very weird state - this is only possible at very very low temperatures.
If the popular account emphasizes the very low temperature (because this is the experimental challenge) you could get the idea that this is what causes the light to slow down.
 
russ_watters said:
Welcome to PF.

2.7 K is a temperature, not a substance/medium, so I'm not sure what you think it has to do with this issue, but it sounds like you mistakenly think there is a connection. Photons aren't matter. '

Light travels at extremely slow speed at absolute zero.

Light acts like a particle as well as a wave. It's not matter, however experiments prove that like acts much the same way.
 
nkt said:
Light travels at extremely slow speed at absolute zero.

Light acts like a particle as well as a wave. It's not matter, however experiments prove that like acts much the same way.

The speed of light does not depend on the temperature. The properties of matter do however, and the properties of matter do determine how light is transmitted.

For the 3rd time from a 3rd person temperature has no direct effect on the speed of light.
 
My bad, i thought the experiment was done through a vacuum.
 
Just to add another point, remember that a vacuum doesn't have a temperature. Temperature is a measure of the kinetic energy of particles, in a vacuum, where there are no particles, there is not such thing as a temperature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 122 ·
5
Replies
122
Views
21K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K