Is It Possible to Reach the Speed of Light with a Spacecraft?

Click For Summary
A spacecraft traveling at half the speed of light cannot shoot a bullet that also travels at half the speed of light to achieve the speed of light relative to an outside observer. Instead, the speed of the bullet would be calculated using the relativistic addition of velocity formula, resulting in a speed of 0.8 times the speed of light. No observer, regardless of their relative motion, would ever measure the bullet's speed as equal to the speed of light. Additionally, as objects approach light speed, they gain mass, requiring increasingly larger forces to accelerate further. Ultimately, reaching the speed of light is deemed impossible due to the infinite mass and energy requirements.
Andrew Buren
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
If you had a spaceship travleing at half the speed of light then shot a bulit at half the speed of light again, would the bulit appear to go the speed of light relative to an outside obverver?
(All preposed in theory, of cource.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If not, why?
 
Andrew Buren said:
If you had a spaceship travleing at half the speed of light then shot a bulit at half the speed of light again, would the bulit appear to go the speed of light relative to an outside obverver?
(All preposed in theory, of cource.)
No. To find the speed of the bullet with respect to that outside observer, you must use the relativistic addition of velocity formula:

V_{a/c} = \frac{V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}}{1 + (V_{a/b} V_{b/c})/c^2}

Which gives: (0.5c + 0.5c)/(1 + (.5)^2) = 0.8 c
 
Last edited:
The "outside observor" being assumed to be one relative to which the spaceship is moving at (1/2)c, of course. There can exist "outside observors" with other speeds relative to the spaceship!
 
Good point. :wink:
 
So this is like the idea that objects within a black hole can appear to be exceeding c, even though they aren't?
 
Hi there,

But no matter what, the bullet would never have c for any observer, in any relative frame.

Cheers
 
NWH said:
So this is like the idea that objects within a black hole can appear to be exceeding c, even though they aren't?

Since we cannot observe an object within a black hole, I have no idea what "appear" can mean here.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Since we cannot observe an object within a black hole, I have no idea what "appear" can mean here.
Hypothetically speaking, of course...
 
  • #10
ccording to Einstein's special theory of relativity, objects gain mass as they accelerate to greater and greater speeds. Now, to get an object to move faster, you need to give it some sort of push. An object that has more mass needs a bigger push than an object with less mass. If an object reached the speed of light, it would have an infinite amount of mass and need an infinite amount of push, or acceleration, to keep it moving. No rocket engine, no matter how powerful, could do tthis
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
642
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 130 ·
5
Replies
130
Views
14K