I Speeding up the half-life of plutonium

  • Thread starter Thread starter RobinBanks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Half-life Neutron
Click For Summary
Speeding up the half-life of plutonium using neutrons is theoretically possible, but the practical application involves using a nuclear reactor to consume plutonium-239, rendering it unusable for weapons. The discussion highlights that while plutonium is manmade and primarily produced from uranium, simply ceasing its production is the most effective way to prevent its use in nuclear arms. There are significant civilian stockpiles of plutonium, estimated at 371 metric tons, which could potentially be converted into nuclear weapons. Induced fission does not equate to radioactive decay, and accelerating alpha decay is considered virtually impossible. Overall, the focus remains on managing plutonium through reactor use and production cessation to mitigate nuclear weapon proliferation.
RobinBanks
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Want more information on speeding up the half-life of plutonium with neutrons
I know that it is possible to speed up the half-life of plutonium with neutrons. Who can tell me more about this? Thoughts on harnessing this power to decay plutonium so it's unusable in nuclear weapons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RobinBanks said:
TL;DR Summary: Want more information on speeding up the half-life of plutonium with neutrons

I know that it is possible to speed up the half-life of plutonium with neutrons. Who can tell me more about this? Thoughts on harnessing this power to decay plutonium so it's unusable in nuclear weapons?
The strategy sounds like building a nuclear reactor fueled with Pu-239. By fissioning it in a reactor, it becomes unavailable for fissioning in a nuclear weapon.

Normally, one uses a fast neutron reactor/breeder reactor to convert U-238 into Pu-239 that is then consumed. Such a reactor ends up producing as much Plutonium as it consumes. This lets you burn the relatively plentiful and inexpensive U-238 instead of the relatively rare and expensive U-235. But I assume that it would be possible to skip the breeding part and just consume the Pu-239. That would not be economically attractive, of course.

I am no expert. Just reporting what I was able to Google up in a few minutes.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, berkeman and RobinBanks
RobinBanks said:
I know that it is possible to speed up the half-life of plutonium with neutrons.
Can you tell us where you heard that?
 
RobinBanks said:
Thoughts on harnessing this power to decay plutonium so it's unusable in nuclear weapons?
Remember that plutonium is virtually entirely manmade. There aren't deposits of plutonium in the ground that we dig up, we have to make it out of Uranium. While you can probably throw plutonium into a reactor to 'burn it off', the most effective way to keep plutonium from being used in nuclear weapons is to simply stop making it. Though that might be an issue if it's a natural byproduct of normal nuclear reactor operation.

Edit: Interestingly, there is apparently about 371 metric tons of separated plutonium in the world's 'civilian stockpiles', enough for about 46,000 nuclear weapons. Per this site: https://www.ntiindex.org/recommenda...Data Highlights,first NTI Index was published.
 
RobinBanks said:
I know that it is possible to speed up the half-life of plutonium with neutrons.
It's not. Induced fission is not a radioactive decay.
Plutonium is only useful in weapons when it is made specifically for that purpose. You can make it unusable for weapons by putting it back into a nuclear reactor where some of it will fission and some of it will capture another neutron.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, Astronuc and gmax137
I think that accelerating alpha decay for any particle is virtually impossible. Note that alchemists dream was to accelerate the decay alpha of Hg 201, whose half-life is about the universe lifetime
 
Theoretical physicist C.N. Yang died at the age of 103 years on October 18, 2025. He is the Yang in Yang-Mills theory, which he and his collaborators devised in 1953, which is a generic quantum field theory that is used by scientists to study amplitudes (i.e. vector probabilities) that are foundational in all Standard Model processes and most quantum gravity theories. He also won a Nobel prize in 1957 for his work on CP violation. (I didn't see the post in General Discussions at PF on his...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
303
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K