Spherical Capacitor with Frequency Dependent Dielectric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving a spherical capacitor with an inner conductor of radius a and an outer conductor of radius c, where the dielectric permittivity ε(ω) is frequency-dependent. The potential difference is given by V(t) = V₀cos(ωt). Key results include the electric field E(r,t) and electric flux density D(r,t) in the regions a and b, as well as the free and induced surface charge densities at the conductors. The capacitance formula derived is C = (Q/ΔV) = (4πabcε(ω)ε₀)/(ε₀(bc - ac) + ε(ω)(ab - ac)).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spherical capacitors and their configurations
  • Knowledge of electric fields and electric flux density
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in electrostatics
  • Basic concepts of dielectric materials and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields in dielectric materials
  • Learn about the application of Legendre polynomials in electrostatics
  • Research the implications of frequency-dependent dielectrics on capacitance
  • Explore advanced techniques for solving electrostatic problems with boundary conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on capacitor design, dielectric materials, and electrostatics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of spherical capacitors and their behavior under varying conditions.

CopyOfA
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
This is a long post. Sorry...

1. Homework Statement


We are given a spherical capacitor with an inner conductor of radius ##a## and outer conductor of radius ##c##. The space between the conductors is half filled (##a<r<b##) with a dielectric with permittivity ##\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)## and vacuum in the region ##b<r<c##. The potential difference between the conductors is ##V\left(t \right) = \phi\left(c,t \right) - \phi\left(a,t \right) = V_{0}\cos\left(\omega t\right)##. Find the electric field and the electric flux density in the regions ##a<r<b## and ##b<r<c##. Also find the free and induced surface charge density residing on the surfaces ##r=a##, ##r=b##, and ##r=c##.

Homework Equations



This is a spherically symmetric problem, so the electric field and electric flux density will be functions of ##r## only. Since there is no free charge inside the sphere,
$$\nabla^2 \phi\left(r,t\right) = 0$$ Also,
  1. ##\mathbf{E}\left(r,t\right) = E_{r}\left(r,t\right) = -\nabla \phi##
  2. ##\mathbf{D}\left(r,t\right) = D_{r}\left(r,t\right) = \varepsilon(r,\omega)\mathbf{E}\left(r,t\right)##
The boundary conditions are:
  1. Denoting the regions as 1 (##a<r<b##) and 2 (##b<r<c##), $$\phi_{2}\left(c,t\right) - \phi_{1}\left(a,t\right) = V_{0}\cos\left(\omega t\right)$$
  2. At ##r=b##, $$\mathbf{D}_{1} = \mathbf{D}_2 \Longrightarrow \varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\nabla \phi_{1}\left(b,t\right) = \varepsilon_{0}\nabla \phi_{2}\left(b,t\right)$$ and $$\phi_{1}\left(b,t\right) = \phi_{2}\left(b,t\right)$$

The Attempt at a Solution


  1. At ##r=b##, the induced surface charge density of the dielectric is: $$\sigma_{P}\left(r=b\right) = \hat{r} \cdot \left(\mathbf{P}_1 - \mathbf{P}_2\right) = \hat{r} \cdot \mathbf{P}_1 = \hat{r} \cdot \varepsilon_{0}\chi_{1}\left(\omega\right)\mathbf{E}_1\left(b,t\right) = \left(\varepsilon\left(\omega\right) - \varepsilon_0\right)E_{r}\left(b,t\right)$$
  2. At ##r=a##, the free surface charge density is: $$ \sigma_{f}\left(a\right) = \hat{r}\cdot \mathbf{D}_{1}\left(a,t\right) = \varepsilon\left(\omega\right)E_{r}\left(a,t\right)$$
The solution to ##\nabla^2 \phi\left(r,t\right) = 0## is the Legendre polynomials, and for a sphere: $$\phi\left(r,t\right) = \begin{cases} \dfrac{-A_1}{r} + B_1 & a<r<b\\ \dfrac{-A_1}{r} + B_1 & b<r<c \end{cases}$$ Hence, in region (1), $$ E_{r,1}\left(r,t\right) = -\nabla \phi_{1} = -\dfrac{A_1}{r^2}$$ and $$D_{r,1}\left(r,t\right) = \varepsilon\left(\omega\right)E_{r,1} = -\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\dfrac{A_1}{r^2}$$ In region (2), $$E_{r,2}\left(r,t\right) = -\dfrac{A_2}{r^2}$$ and $$D_{r,2}\left(r,t\right) = -\varepsilon_{0}\dfrac{A_2}{r^2}$$ Using boundary conditions: numer (2) yields $$-\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\dfrac{A_1}{b^2} = -\varepsilon_{0}\dfrac{A_2}{b^2} \Longrightarrow A_{2} = \dfrac{\epsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_{0}}A_1$$ and $$\dfrac{-A_1}{b} + B_1 = \dfrac{-A_2}{b} + B_2\\\dfrac{-A_1}{b} + B_1= \dfrac{-1}{b}\left( \dfrac{\epsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_{0}}A_1\right)+ B_2\\ \dfrac{A_1}{b}\left( \dfrac{\epsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_{0}} - 1\right) = B_2 - B_1 $$ Using B.C. number (1) yields: $$V_0 \cos\left(\omega t\right) = \dfrac{-A_2}{c} + B_2 + \dfrac{A_1}{a} - B_1 = -\dfrac{1}{c}\left(\dfrac{\epsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_{0}}A_1\right) + \dfrac{A_1}{a} + \dfrac{A_1}{b}\left( \dfrac{\epsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_{0}} - 1\right)\\ V_{0}\cos\left(\omega t\right) = \left[\dfrac{\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_0}\left(\dfrac{1}{b} - \dfrac{1}{c}\right) + \left(\dfrac{1}{a} - \dfrac{1}{b}\right)\right]A_1 = K_1 A_1$$
Hence $$A_1 = \dfrac{V_0}{K_1}\cos\left(\omega t\right)$$ $$ A_2 = \dfrac{\epsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_{0}} \dfrac{V_0}{K_1}\cos\left(\omega t\right) = \left[\dfrac{1}{b} - \dfrac{1}{c} + \dfrac{\varepsilon_0}{\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)}\left(\dfrac{1}{b} - \dfrac{1}{a}\right)\right]^{-1} V_0 \cos\left(\omega t\right) = \dfrac{V_0}{K_2}\cos\left(\omega t\right)$$
Since we need the difference $$B_2 - B_1 = \dfrac{A_1}{b}\left( \dfrac{\epsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_{0}} - 1\right)$$ we can choose ##B_1 = 0## and then $$B_2 = \dfrac{A_1}{b}\left( \dfrac{\epsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_{0}} - 1\right) = \left(\dfrac{\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_0} - 1\right)\dfrac{V_0}{b K1}\cos\left(\omega t\right)$$
Finally, $$\phi_{1}\left(r,t\right) = -\dfrac{V_0}{K_1 r}\cos\left(\omega t\right) = \dfrac{abc\varepsilon_0}{\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\left(ab-ac\right) + \varepsilon_{0}\left(bc-ac\right)}\dfrac{V_0}{r}\cos\left(\omega t\right)$$
and, $$\phi_{2}\left(r,t\right) = -\dfrac{V_0}{K_2}\cos\left(\omega t\right) + \left(\dfrac{\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_0} - 1\right)\dfrac{V_0}{b K1}\cos\left(\omega t\right) \\ \phi_{2}\left(r,t\right) = \dfrac{ac\left(r\left(\epsilon\left(\omega\right) - \varepsilon_0\right) - b\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\right)}{\varepsilon_0\left(a c - b c\right) + \varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\left(a c - a b\right)}\dfrac{V_0}{r}\cos\left(\omega t \right)$$

Using these results,
$$\begin{align*}

E_{r}\left(r,t\right) &= \begin{cases}

-\dfrac{V_0}{K r^2}\cos\left(\omega t\right) & a<r<b\\

\mbox{}\\

-\dfrac{\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)}{\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{V_0}{Kr^2}\cos\left(\omega t\right), & b<r<c

\end{cases}\\

D_{r}\left(r,t\right) &= \begin{cases}

-\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\dfrac{V_0}{K r^2}\cos\left(\omega t\right) & a<r<b\\

\mbox{}\\

-\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\dfrac{V_0}{Kr^2}\cos\left(\omega t\right), & b<r<c

\end{cases}

\end{align*}$$

Then using the equations for free and induced surface charge density,

$$\begin{align*}

\sigma_f\left(a\right) &= -\varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\dfrac{V_0}{K a^2}\cos\left(\omega t\right)\\

\sigma_P\left(b\right) &= \left(\varepsilon_0 - \varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\right)\dfrac{V_0}{K b^2}\cos\left(\omega t\right)

\end{align*}$$

The surface charge density at ##r=c## will be equal and opposite that at ##r=a##.Using these quantities to calculate the capacitance yields:

$$\begin{align*}

C = \dfrac{Q}{\Delta V} = \dfrac{\sigma_f A_S}{V_0 \cos\left(\omega t\right)} = \dfrac{4\pi abc \varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\varepsilon_0}{\varepsilon_{0}\left(bc -ac\right) + \varepsilon\left(\omega\right)\left(ab-ac\right)}

\end{align*}$$

My professor gave an instruction at the end of the problem saying: "To simplify notation you may introduce as an intermediate quantity the charge on the outer sphere provided you eventually give an expression for it in terms of the voltage." I don't know if I am making some wrong assumptions or why I would need this intermediate term as I already found the surface charge densities. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That approach looks longer than I would expect.
I would follow the hint of the professor, as such a charge variable allows to calculate all variables step by step instead of getting huge systems of equations. You do not need it, but it makes the solution easier.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K