Spin 1/2 Basis Change Homework Solution

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the unitary operator U that transforms the spin operator Sn for a spin 1/2 particle along an arbitrary axis n into Sz. The user initially derived U but failed to recover Sz after applying it to Sn. They later realized that U must be orthogonal, leading to the conclusion that the azimuthal angle φ should be zero for orthogonality to the z-axis. However, other participants clarified that φ can take any value, and the correct form of U should include the eigenvectors of Sn as its columns. Ultimately, the user was guided to verify that their matrix U is unitary and correctly diagonalizes Sn without the restriction of φ being zero.
beebopbellopu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is from my first-quarter graduate QM course. Part 4 of this problem asks me to compute the unitary operator U which transforms Sn into Sz, where Sn is the spin operator for spin 1/2 quantized along some arbitrary axis n = icos\phisinθ + jsin\phisinθ + zcosθ.

Homework Equations



From part 1, I solved Sn = \begin{pmatrix} cosθ&sinθe-i\phi\\ sinθei\phi&-cosθ \end{pmatrix}

|n;+> = cos(θ/2)|+> + sin(θ/2)ei\phi|->
|n;-> = sin(θ/2)|+> - cos(θ/2)ei\phi|->

where |+> and |-> are the spin up and down states along the z-axis

Also: U(adjoint)SnU = Sz

The Attempt at a Solution



U = Ʃ|n;±><±| = |n;+><+| + |n;-><-| = [cos(θ/2)|+> + sin(θ/2)ei\phi|->]<+| + [sin(θ/2)|+> - cos(θ/2)ei\phi|->]<-|

I then calculated out <+|U|+>, <-|U|+>, <+|U|->, and <-|U|-> to get the 4 elements of the unitary operator matrix, and end up with:

U = \begin{pmatrix}cos(θ/2)&sin(θ/2)ei\phi\\sin(θ/2)&-cos(θ/2)ei\phi\end{pmatrix}

However I used that to transform Sn and could not recover Sz. U(adjoint) is just the transpose complex conjugate so then I should be using:

U(adjoint) = \begin{pmatrix}cos(θ/2)&sin(θ/2)\\sin(θ/2)e-i\phi&-cos(θ/2)e-i\phi\end{pmatrix}

I'm not quite sure where to go from here.

Edit: I also can't figure out how to post matrices, if someone can help with that also. Thanks!

Edit 2: Thanks vela for the fix.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fixed your LaTeX.
beebopbellopu said:

Homework Statement



This is from my first-quarter graduate QM course. Part 4 of this problem asks me to compute the unitary operator U which transforms Sn into Sz, where Sn is the spin operator for spin 1/2 quantized along some arbitrary axis n = icos\phisinθ + jsin\phisinθ + zcosθ


Homework Equations



From part 1, I solved Sn = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta &amp; e^{-i\phi}\sin\theta \\ e^{i\phi} \sin \theta &amp; -\cosθ \end{pmatrix}


|n;+> = cos(θ/2)|+> + sin(θ/2)ei\phi|->
|n;-> = sin(θ/2)|+> - cos(θ/2)ei\phi|->

where |+> and |-> are the spin up and down states along the z-axis.

Also: U(adjoint)SnU = Sz

The Attempt at a Solution



U = Ʃ|n;±><±| = |n;+><+| + |n;-><-| = [cos(θ/2)|+> + sin(θ/2)ei\phi|->]<+| + [sin(θ/2)|+> - cos(θ/2)ei\phi|->]<-|

I then calculated out <+|U|+>, <-|U|+>, <+|U|->, and <-|U|-> to get the 4 elements of the unitary operator matrix, and end up with:
U = \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\theta/2) &amp; e^{i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) \\ \sin(\theta/2) &amp; -e^{i\phi}cos(θ/2)\end{pmatrix}

However I used that to transform Sn and could not recover Sz. U(adjoint) is just the transpose complex conjugate so then I should be using:

U^\dagger = \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\theta/2) &amp; \sin(\theta/2) \\ e^{-i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) &amp; -e^{-i\phi}cos(\theta/2)\end{pmatrix}

I'm not quite sure where to go from here.

Edit: I also can't figure out how to post matrices, if someone can help with that also. Thanks!
 
Okay so I did out the matrix math a little further, found some more double angle identities and so forth, and if I set \phi to 0 after multiplying through it comes out to σ3 which is what I want for Sz.

I think that this is because the unitary operator has to keep the inner product and its therefore an orthogonal transformation, meaning U must be orthogonal. If that's the case then it has to have real elements and the only way for that is if phi = 0, which makes sense in that the the azimuthal angle needs to be 0 in order to be orthogonal to the z-axis.

Is that correct?
 
Your matrix for Sn is missing an overall factor of 1/2.

If you multiply the second eigenvector by e-iΦ, you'll have
\begin{align*}
\vert + \rangle_n &= \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\theta/2) \\ e^{i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) \end{pmatrix} \\
\vert - \rangle_n &= \begin{pmatrix} e^{-i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) \\ -\cos(\theta/2)\end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}(It's not really necessary to do this. I'm just doing it for aesthetic reasons.)

If you recall your basic linear algebra, you know that the matrix U that diagonalizes Sn has the eigenvectors of Sn as its columns, so you haveU=\begin{pmatrix} <br /> \cos(\theta/2) &amp; e^{-i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) \\ <br /> e^{i\phi}\sin(\theta/2) &amp; -\cos(\theta/2)<br /> \end{pmatrix}
You can verify that this matrix is in fact unitary for any value of the angles and that it will diagonalize Sn. Requiring Φ=0 isn't acceptable since n can point in any direction.

For some reason, you ended up with the transpose of this matrix.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K