Spin-orbit Interaction & Degenerate Perturbation Theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the spin-orbit interaction in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the implications of the non-commutation of operators related to angular momentum and spin. Participants explore the evaluation of matrix elements involving the operator \(\hat{S} \cdot \hat{L}\) and the states \(| nlm_lsm_s\rangle\), questioning the conditions under which these evaluations can be performed.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that since \([\hat{S} \cdot \hat{L}, \hat{L_z}] \ne 0\) and \([\hat{S} \cdot \hat{L}, \hat{S_z}] \ne 0\), the operator \(\hat{S} \cdot \hat{L}\) does not share a common set of eigenstates with \(\hat{S_z}\) and \(\hat{L_z}\).
  • Another participant questions the conclusion that the matrix element \(\langle nlm_l'sm_s'|\hat{S}\cdot\hat{L}|nlm_lsm_s\rangle\) cannot be evaluated if \(| nlm_lsm_s\rangle\) is not an eigenstate of \(\hat{S} \cdot \hat{L}\).
  • A participant suggests that the eigenvalue equation can only be evaluated for eigenstates, implying a potential misunderstanding in evaluating the matrix element.
  • Another participant explains that operators can act on any state within their domain, resulting in a state that is not necessarily an eigenstate.
  • Participants inquire about methods to demonstrate that the matrix element is not diagonal.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the evaluation of matrix elements when the states involved are not eigenstates of the operator in question. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of this non-commutation and the methods for evaluating the matrix elements.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the need for specific mathematical techniques, such as using Clebsch-Gordan coefficients or integral calculations, to evaluate matrix elements, highlighting the complexity of the topic.

PhysicsKin
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello! This is my first time posting, so please correct me if I have done anything incorrectly.

There's something that I don't understand about the spin-orbit interaction.

First of all I know that
[\hat{S} \cdot \hat{L}, \hat{L_z}] \ne 0
[\hat{S} \cdot \hat{L}, \hat{S_z}] \ne 0

so this means that \hat{S} \cdot \hat{L} doesn't share a common set of eigenstates with \hat{S_z} and \hat{L_z}.

I know that | nlm_lsm_s> is a common eigenstate for \hat{S_z} and \hat{L_z},
so that would mean it is not an eigenstate for \hat{S} \cdot \hat{L}.

However, I've read that <nlm_l'sm_s'|\hat{S}\cdot\hat{J}|nlm_lsm_s>\ne0 for all m_l \ne m_l', m_s\ne m_s' i.e. the diagonal elements are non-zero. Surely if | nlm_lsm_s> is not an eigenstate of \hat{S} \cdot \hat{L}, then the matrix element cannot be evaluated?

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsKin said:
Surely if | nlm_lsm_s> is not an eigenstate of \hat{S} \cdot \hat{L}, then the matrix element cannot be evaluated?
I can't follow your conclusion.
 
Hiya! Thanks for the reply!

I think my thought process went like this:
Suppose I have an operator \hat{Q}, then the eigenvalue equation \hat{Q} |q>=q|q> can only be evaluated if |q> is an eigenstate of \hat{Q}.
Then since |nlm_lsm_s> is not an eigenstate of \hat{S}\cdot\hat{L}, then surely the matrix element <nlm_l'sm_s'| \hat{S}\cdot\hat{L}|nlm_lsm_s> could not be evaluated? I feel like something went wrong, because all the books I've read managed to evaluate it to be \ne 0 for m_l'\ne m_l \& m_s'\ne m_s. Or could you shed some light into how to go about evaluating it?

Thank you so much!
 
Of course, |q> is only an eigenstate if it fulfills the eigenvalue equation. However, Q can act on any state within it's domain of definition, only that the resulting state will not be a multiple of the original state.
E.g. take ##Q=L_z## and ## |q\rangle =a |m>+b|m'>## where |m> and |m'> are eigenvectors of ##>L_z## with corresponding eigenvalues m and m', respectively. Then ##L_z|q\rangle=a m |m\rangle +b m' |m'\rangle##.
 
Ok I see you what you mean, but how could I evaluate the matrix elements <nlm_l'sm_s'|\hat{S}\cdot\hat{L}|nlm_lsm_s> if I cannot use the eigenvalue equation?
 
PhysicsKin said:
Ok I see you what you mean, but how could I evaluate the matrix elements <nlm_l'sm_s'|\hat{S}\cdot\hat{L}|nlm_lsm_s> if I cannot use the eigenvalue equation?
Either you express ##| n l m_l m_s \rangle## in terms of a linear combination of eigenstates of ##\hat{S}\cdot\hat{L}## (in this particular case, using Clebsch-Gordan coefficients), or you actually calculate the integral corresponding to the bracket, as you would do to calculate ##\langle \hat{x} \rangle## or ##\langle \hat{p} \rangle## for say an eigenstate of the harmonic oscillator.
 
Is there a quick way to show that it is not diagonal?
 
PhysicsKin said:
Is there a quick way to show that it is not diagonal?
$$
[\hat{L}_z, \hat{S}\cdot\hat{L} ] \neq 0
$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
909
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K