Spin states for two identical 1/2 particles - Confused :s

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the spin states of a system of two identical spin-1/2 particles, specifically electrons. Participants explore the total spin and total magnetic quantum numbers associated with these particles, examining both symmetric and antisymmetric spin states. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning related to angular momentum addition.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the calculation of total spin and magnetic quantum numbers for two spin-1/2 particles, referencing the textbook's description of symmetric and antisymmetric states.
  • Another participant explains that the addition of angular momentum is not straightforward and provides a formula for determining possible total angular momentum quantum numbers, noting that for two spin-1/2 particles, the total spin can be either 0 or 1.
  • A participant struggles to understand the derivation of the equation for adding spins and questions the reasoning behind the additional terms in the equation.
  • Further clarification is sought regarding the total angular momentum squared and how two positive scalars can combine to yield a total of zero for the composite system.
  • Another participant suggests that calculating the eigenvalues of the total angular momentum operator could clarify the possible values for the total spin.
  • A link to an external resource is provided for additional explanation on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the addition of angular momentum and the implications for total spin states. There is no consensus on the clarity of the mathematical reasoning or the derivation of the relevant equations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in their understanding of the mathematical framework for angular momentum addition, particularly regarding the eigenvalues of the total angular momentum operator and the implications for composite systems.

Sara Kennedy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Im having trouble with my thought process for spin states of a system of two electrons

Using Total Spin 'S' and Total spin mag quantum numbers 'MS' as state ket |S MS>

My textbook states...

" Three Symmetric Spin states
Triplet spin stats for twin identical spin -1/2 particles
  • | Up Up> = |S MS> = |1, 1> "
My thought process, two half spin particles are involved so total spin S is 1/2 + 1/2=1 and two spin ups giving MS as +1/2 + 1/2 =1
  • " 1/√2 ( |Up Down> + |Down Up> ) = |1,0> "
I see this, again two spin particles are involved so its 1 again. However this time MS we two zeros in the bracket, ( (1/2 - 1/2) + (1/2 - 1/2) ) giving overall zero.

  • " | Up Up> = |S MS> = |1, -1> "
I understand, same reasoning as point 1. Total spin as 1 from two half spin particles, and two -1/2 for MS giving -1.

" One Antisymmetric spin state
Singlet spin state for two identical spin-1/2 particles
  • 1/√2 ( |Up Down> - |Down Up> ) = |0,0> "
By my reasoning for the others, this has two spin particles of 1/2 so total spin should be 1 and MS zero again... What is wrong with my though process for how the Total spin and total mag quantum numbers are worked... How are totals calculated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sara Kennedy said:
By my reasoning for the others, this has two spin particles of 1/2 so total spin should be 1
Unfortunately, the addition of angular momentum operators is not simple as it is had they been mere numbers. The eigenvalues of the addition of two angular momenta goes like this
$$
s = |s_1-s_2|,|s_1-s_2|+1,\ldots,|s_1+s_2|-1,|s_1+s_2|
$$
In your problem, ##s_1=s_2=1/2##, putting these values into the above equation, you will get two possible values for the total angular momentum quantum number ##s=0,1##. The first three points you put forth corresponds to ##s=1##, while the last one to ##s=0##.

EDIT: I have replaced the capital ##S## with small ##s##, the former shall be used to denote the operator/matrix, while the latter for the eigenvalues.
 
Last edited:
I've been sitting here 15minutes and still can't see that... I don't follow that equation you wrote or how its derived from adding spin of of two particles.
I get this ... S=|S1+S2| but where is the reasoning for the rest of the equation?
 
Sara Kennedy said:
I've been sitting here 15minutes and still can't see that... I don't follow that equation you wrote or how its derived from adding spin of of two particles.
I get this ... S=|S1+S2| but where is the reasoning for the rest of the equation?

Is this your question:

The square of the total angular momentum of a spin 1/2 particle is ##S^2 = \frac{3 \hbar^2}{4}##. This is a positive scalar. So, how can two positive scalars of the same magnitude cancel out to give a total of ##S^2 = 0## for the composite system?
 
Sara Kennedy said:
I've been sitting here 15minutes and still can't see that... I don't follow that equation you wrote or how its derived from adding spin of of two particles.
I get this ... S=|S1+S2| but where is the reasoning for the rest of the equation?
You can find the values in the rightmost part of the equation in post #2 by first finding the eigenvalues of the operator ##S^2##,
$$
S^2 = S_x^2+S_y^2+S_z^2\\
S_i = S_{i1}\otimes \mathbf{1} + \mathbf{1}\otimes S_{i2}
$$
where ##i=x,y,z## and ##\mathbf{1}## is an identity matrix with the same dimension as ##S_{i1}## (or ##S_{i2}##). The symbol ##\otimes## is called "Kronecker product". It will be a tedious work, but if you are able to find the matrix form of ##S^2## for the composite system of two 1/2-particles and calculate its eigenvalues, you will conclude that ##S## has 4 possible values, three of them are unity, the other one is zero, or in short ##s=0,1##.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K