Spins 1/2 and Time-Dependant Perturbation Theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interaction of two spins 1/2, represented by the Hamiltonian H = α(t)S₁·S₂, where α(t) approaches 0 as |t| approaches infinity and is significant only in the interval [-τ, τ]. The first part of the problem involves calculating the probability of transitioning from state |+-> to state |-+> using first-order perturbation theory, resulting in P = (ħ²/4) |∫ exp(iωt')α(t') dt'|². The second part suggests using the Schrödinger equation to solve the problem exactly, leading to the equation iħ dbₙ/dt = Σ exp(iωₙₖt)Wₙₖbₖ(t), which requires understanding the conditions under which perturbation theory is valid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically spin systems.
  • Familiarity with perturbation theory in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of the Schrödinger equation and its applications.
  • Ability to perform integrals involving complex exponentials.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of first-order perturbation theory in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the properties and behavior of time-dependent Hamiltonians.
  • Explore the mathematical techniques for solving the Schrödinger equation in various contexts.
  • Investigate the implications of the interaction term in spin systems and its physical significance.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on spin systems and perturbation theory, will benefit from this discussion.

Erythro73
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We consider two spins 1/2, \vec{S_{1}} and \vec{S_{2}}, coupled by an interaction of the form H=\alpha(t)\vec{S_{1}}*\vec{S_{2}}. \alpha(t) is a function of time who approches 0 for |t|-->infinity and takes appreciable values only in the interval of [-\tau,\tau] near 0.

a) À t=-infinity, the system is in the state |+->. What is the probability of finding the particle in the state |-+> for t=infinity with the first order perturbation theory.

b) Prove that we can solve exactly this problem with the Schrödinger equation. Suggestion : you can start with the exact equation
$\displaystylei\hbar \frac{db_{n}}{dt}=\sum_{k} exp(iw_{nk}t)W_{nk}b_{k}(t)$

for the b(t) coefficients. Comparing this result with part a), what conditions is required so that perturbation theory is correct?



Homework Equations



$\displaystyle \frac{d^{2}b}{dt^{2}}= \frac{db_{n}}{dt}(\frac{d\alpha}{dt}\frac{1}{\alpha}+C_{1}\alpha)+C_{2}\alpha^2 b$

have the solution

$ b(t)=Aexp(C_{+}\int_{-inf}^{inf}\alpha(t')dt')+Bexp(C_{-}\int_{-infinity}^{t}\alpha(t')dt'$

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
Ok. So, the first thing I did is write \vec{S_{1}}*\vec{S_{2}}=\frac{1}{2}(S_{1+}S_{2-}+S{1-}S{2+}+2S{1z}S{2z}).
I calculated that
\frac{1}{2}<-+|S_{1+}S_{2-}|+->=0
\frac{1}{2}<-+|S_{1-}S_{2+}|+->=\frac{\hbar^2}{4}
\frac{1}{2}<-+|Sz1Sz2|+->=0

So, I used
P=\frac{1}{2}\left|\int_{-inf}^{inf}dt'exp(iwt')\alpha(t)<-+|\vec{S_{1}}*\vec{S_{2}}|+->|\right|^2

which finally gave
P=\frac{\hbar^2}{4}\left| \int_{-inf}^{inf} dt' exp(iwt') \alpha(t') \right| ^2

That's as far as I can go as I don't know \alpha(t).


b) Well... there's the problem. I start with the suggestion,
$\displaystylei\hbar \frac{db_{n}}{dt}=\sum_{k} exp(iw_{nk}t)W_{nk}b_{k}(t)$

I have no clue of where to start from that. Basically, I have to jump from the last equation I wrote to the equations written in the relevant equations. So, I'll try to make what I think, but this could be very wrong.

$\displaystylei\hbar \frac{db_{0}}{dt}=exp(iw_{01}t)W_{10}b_{1}(t)$
Let's say that, for the sake of me not writing more in this already long post, that W(t)=\alpha(t)*K

We have $\displaystylei\hbar \frac{db_{0}}{dt}=exp(iw_{01}t)K\alpha(t)b_{1}(t)$

Now, I'm stuck. I can't take the derivative whit respect to time at each side, because I don't know the b's.

Have a clue? :S


Thank you for reading me!
Erythro73
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I don't have any answer yet... Is it because my thread is badly done (have I forgot to put something?) or because nobody has a clue? :S

I'm still searching on my part.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K