Spivak Calculus Proof: exponents distribute

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on proving the equation $\left(ab^{-1}\right)\left(cd^{-1}\right)^{-1}=\left(ad\right)\left(cb\right)^{-1}$ using fundamental algebraic properties without relying on mathematical induction. The user initially struggled with the concept of distributing exponents but ultimately realized that the proof could be simplified by understanding the expression as $(ab^{-1})(c^{-1}d)=(ad)(c^{-1}b^{-1})$. Key algebraic properties utilized include commutation and association, which are essential for manipulating the expressions correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic properties: commutation and association
  • Familiarity with exponents and their properties, including negative exponents
  • Basic knowledge of multiplicative inverses
  • Concept of closure for addition and multiplication
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exponents, focusing on negative exponents and their equivalence to reciprocals
  • Explore the concept of multiplicative inverses in algebra
  • Learn about the commutative and associative properties in greater depth
  • Review algebraic proofs and techniques for simplifying expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, particularly those working on proofs involving exponents, and educators looking for methods to teach these concepts effectively.

selfteaching9
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove:
<br /> $\left(ab^{-1}\right)\left(cd^{-1}\right)^{-1}=\left(ad\right)\left(cb\right)^{-1}$.<br />

I know how to distribute exponents to get both sides to look identical...

Homework Equations



...but a step in the solution requires distributing exponents. But how do you prove that you can distribute exponents using only:
  1. association for addition and multiplication
  2. commutation for addition and multiplication
  3. identity for addition and multiplication
  4. additive and multiplicative inverses
  5. distribution
  6. trichotomy law
  7. closure for addition and multiplication

The Attempt at a Solution


This problem is presented before mathematical induction is introduced, so I would like to solve it without its use. But here is my attempt at induction:

P(m) = (a^n)^m=a^(n*m)
P(1) = (a^n)^1=a^n
P(k+1)=(a^n)^(k+1)=a^(n*k+n*1)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math induction really doesn't seem called for here.

Can you replace ab-1 by (a)(1/b)? Presumably if you have expressions with negative exponents, you can replace them by reciprocals with positive exponents.

If not, you might use the fact that cd-1 and (cd-1)-1 are multiplicative inverses (i.e., multiply both sides by cd-1).
 
Thanks Mark. I think I figured it out. It turns out I was creating my own problem all along.

The actual statement Spivak wants me to prove is: (a/b)/(c/d)=(ad)/(bc)

By defining this as: (ab^-1)(cd^-1)^-1=(ad)(cb)^-1, I created my own problem. All I have to do to "distribute exponents" is to understand the statement as:

(ab^-1)(c^(-1)d)=(ad)(c^-1b^-1)

after this, it's just commutation and association
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K