Spring (conservation energy) with friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block attached to a spring, where the spring is compressed and then released while experiencing a constant friction force. The objective is to determine the position at which the block's speed is maximized, considering the effects of both the spring's potential energy and the work done against friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the work-energy theorem and how to incorporate the work done by friction into the energy equations. There are questions about the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy at different positions, particularly at the point of maximum speed.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different interpretations of the energy equations and the role of friction. Some guidance has been provided regarding the setup of the equations, but there remains uncertainty about the correct application of potential energy and the displacement variable.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on maintaining consistent units throughout the calculations, with participants discussing the implications of using centimeters versus meters. Additionally, there is a focus on the assumption that potential energy can be set to zero at various points, which influences the calculations.

neotriz
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of mass 1.6 kg is attached to a horizontal spring that has a force constant 900 N/m. The spring is compressed 2.0 cm and is then released from rest.

a) A constant friction force of 3.8 N retards the block's motion from the moment it is released. At what position x of the block is its speed a maximum?

m=1.6kg
K=900 N/m
Friction=3.8N
s=2cm

Homework Equations



PE=.5Kx^2 (elastic potential energy function from the spring)
KE=.5mv^2
PE[a]+KE[a]=PE+KE, where [a] is the initial position of the question, and is where the position of x.


The Attempt at a Solution



Since [a] is the initial position, then the equation that I wrote above will get rid of KE[a], since there is no Kinetic energy involved (It is at rest). Furthermore, at , it will get rid of PE because when finding the speed is max, PE is zero and KE is at the max.

That being said, what throws me off is the friction that slows down the block after it is released.

So my next guess was since we got rid of KE[a] and PE, I put the equations accordingly like this:

.5Kx^2=.5mv^2

But I don't know where to apply the Friction given.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi neotriz! Welcome to PF! :smile:
neotriz said:
A block of mass 1.6 kg is attached to a horizontal spring that has a force constant 900 N/m. The spring is compressed 2.0 cm and is then released from rest.

a) A constant friction force of 3.8 N retards the block's motion from the moment it is released. At what position x of the block is its speed a maximum?

PE[a]+KE[a]=PE+KE

But I don't know where to apply the Friction given.


The work-energy theorem states that work done = energy lost,

so PE[a]+KE[a]=PE+KE + work done :wink:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi neotriz! Welcome to PF! :smile:


The work-energy theorem states that work done = energy lost,

so PE[a]+KE[a]=PE+KE + work done :wink:


Thanks :smile:

But I still don't get it.
If it that was the case, how would I find the velocity at ?

.
 
Also, the answer must leave in cm unit. So I guess I have don't have to change the unit when it is compressing 2cm, right?
 
neotriz said:
If it that was the case, how would I find the velocity at ?


Just call it v
neotriz said:
Also, the answer must leave in cm unit. So I guess I have don't have to change the unit when it is compressing 2cm, right?

No, wrong!

Change into m for formulas like 1/2 kx2, and change back again at the end, or the squares can get you into serious trouble. :frown:
 
tiny-tim said:
Just call it v

I don't understand

When I do the calculation, I have everything except the displacements (the one it is asking me to find) and the max velocity. How would I find the latter one?

One more thing: Do we assume at x, PE is zero?
 
neotriz said:
Do we assume at x, PE is zero?

You can set PE = 0 anywhere … PE is always relative

but it makes the maths a lot easier if you set it at 0 at the uncompressed length :wink:
I don't understand

When I do the calculation, I have everything except the displacements (the one it is asking me to find) and the max velocity. How would I find the latter one?

Show us how far you've got with your calculation :smile:
 
Here's what I have:

PE[a]=KE+Work done by friction (correct)?

thus

.5K(x)^2 = .5mv^2 + Work done

.5(900N/m)(2.00 X 1-^-2 m)^2 = .5(1.6)v^2 + 3.8N(s)

NOTE: I changed 2.00 cm to 2.00 X 10^-2

Through alebraic manipulations, I get:

.18 = .8v^2 + 3.8(s), where I guess (s) is what I am trying to find
 
neotriz said:
.5K(x)^2 = .5mv^2 + Work done

No, you need .5Kx2 (with different x) on both sides

and your s is related to x
 
  • #10
tiny-tim said:
No, you need .5Kx2 (with different x) on both sides

and your s is related to x

So that means
what I wrote before:
PE[a]=KE+Work done

"The Work Done" is included the Friction's and the Spring's at x?
 
  • #11
perhaps I should have been clearer …

the work done in that equation is only the work done by friction

(technically, PE is work done, but when it's a conservative force, such as gravity or a spring, we call it PE instead)
 
  • #12
So where is the other .5Kx^2 from the otherside is coming from?

I'm really sorry, I'm new at this physics thinking
 
  • #13
One side is the initial energy of the spring, the other side is the energy of the spring at a general time
 
  • #14
tiny-tim said:
One side is the initial energy of the spring, the other side is the energy of the spring at a general time

But I thought at x, there is no PE, meaning KE is at max.
 
  • #15
neotriz said:
But I thought at x, there is no PE, meaning KE is at max.

uhh? :confused:

x is at max KE, so at min PE, not zero PE

you can set PE = 0 at any position you like

but if you want to use PE = 1/2 kx2, then x is measured relative to the uncompressed length, and the PE will therefore be 0 at the uncompressed length.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K