Sqrt(a) + sqrt(b) = r, can r be whole?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter johann1301h
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the equation r = √a + √b, where a and b are distinct natural numbers that cannot be expressed as squares of integers. It concludes that r cannot be a natural number under these conditions. The reasoning is that if a and b are non-square integers, they must have at least one prime factor of odd degree, leading to the conclusion that r cannot be a natural number unless a or b is a perfect square. The discussion references a proof from Math Stack Exchange that supports this conclusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of natural numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with square roots and perfect squares
  • Basic knowledge of prime factorization
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and contradictions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of prime factorization in natural numbers
  • Learn about the implications of square roots in number theory
  • Explore mathematical proofs related to sums of square roots
  • Review the Math Stack Exchange discussion on finite sums of square roots
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of natural numbers and square roots.

johann1301h
Messages
71
Reaction score
1
a and b are different natural numbers which can not be written on the form a = k1^2 or b = k2^2 where k1 and k2 are integers.

r = √a + √b.

can r be a natural number?

(ive tried assuming r IS a natural number and then finding a contradiction, but without success)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If we allow that k1 and k2 are rational (not necessarily integers), then it's trivial. Choose a = 1/16 and b = 9/16. Then you have r = 1.
 
TeethWhitener said:
If we allow that k1 and k2 are rational (not necessarily integers), then it's trivial. Choose a = 1/16 and b = 9/16. Then you have r = 1.
Yes, i see. But k1 and k2 are indeed integers.
 
##(a;b;r) = (6,25;2,25;4)##
 
fresh_42 said:
##(a;b;r) = (6,25;2,25;4)##
Could you elaborate?
 
johann1301h said:
Yes, i see. But k1 and k2 are indeed integers.
k1=1/4 and k2=3/4, neither of which are integers.
 
TeethWhitener said:
k1=1/4 and k2=3/4, neither of which are integers.
I understand that 1/4, 3/4, 1/16 and 9/16 are all not integers. But what I am wondering is if k1 and k2 are both integers, can r be a natural number?
 
So to clarify since I see people keep giving fractions as proposed answers:

Is there an r = √a + √b where a, b, and r are natural numbers and a and b are not squares? I like the question!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
DocZaius said:
So to clarify since I see people keep giving fractions as proposed answers:

Is there an r = √a + √b where a, b, and r are natural numbers and a and b are not squares. I like the question!
Yes, that's right.
 
  • #11
The answer is no, unless you allow negative square roots. ##a## and ##b## being non square integers mean they have at least one prime factor of odd degree. We may assume ##a## itself has only pairwise distinct primes (i.e. ##1## as their power).
So we get ##a = (\sqrt{a})^2 = (r - \sqrt{b})^2 = r^2 + b - 2r\sqrt{b}## which can only hold for square numbers ##b##.
But then ##a## is a natural number and the square root of single primes, which cannot be.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ProfuselyQuarky and micromass
  • #12
DocZaius said:
So to clarify since I see people keep giving fractions as proposed answers:

Is there an r = √a + √b where a, b, and r are natural numbers and a and b are not squares? I like the question!
Ah, I missed the word "natural" in the OP. Sorry about that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K