Sqrt(a) + sqrt(b) = r, can r be whole?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter johann1301h
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation r = √a + √b, where a and b are different natural numbers that cannot be expressed as squares of integers. Participants explore whether r can also be a natural number under these conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if a and b are not squares of integers, it is unclear if r can be a natural number.
  • Another participant suggests that if k1 and k2 are allowed to be rational, then r can be a natural number, providing examples with fractional values.
  • Some participants emphasize that k1 and k2 must be integers, questioning the validity of previous examples involving fractions.
  • A later reply asserts that if a and b are non-square integers, they must have at least one prime factor of odd degree, leading to the conclusion that r cannot be a natural number.
  • Several participants seek clarification on whether there exists a case where a, b, and r are all natural numbers, reiterating the importance of the non-square condition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus. There are competing views on whether r can be a natural number, with some arguing it is impossible under the given conditions while others explore different interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the implications of allowing rational values for k1 and k2, and the discussion includes unresolved mathematical reasoning about the nature of prime factors in relation to the equation.

johann1301h
Messages
71
Reaction score
1
a and b are different natural numbers which can not be written on the form a = k1^2 or b = k2^2 where k1 and k2 are integers.

r = √a + √b.

can r be a natural number?

(ive tried assuming r IS a natural number and then finding a contradiction, but without success)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If we allow that k1 and k2 are rational (not necessarily integers), then it's trivial. Choose a = 1/16 and b = 9/16. Then you have r = 1.
 
TeethWhitener said:
If we allow that k1 and k2 are rational (not necessarily integers), then it's trivial. Choose a = 1/16 and b = 9/16. Then you have r = 1.
Yes, i see. But k1 and k2 are indeed integers.
 
##(a;b;r) = (6,25;2,25;4)##
 
fresh_42 said:
##(a;b;r) = (6,25;2,25;4)##
Could you elaborate?
 
johann1301h said:
Yes, i see. But k1 and k2 are indeed integers.
k1=1/4 and k2=3/4, neither of which are integers.
 
TeethWhitener said:
k1=1/4 and k2=3/4, neither of which are integers.
I understand that 1/4, 3/4, 1/16 and 9/16 are all not integers. But what I am wondering is if k1 and k2 are both integers, can r be a natural number?
 
So to clarify since I see people keep giving fractions as proposed answers:

Is there an r = √a + √b where a, b, and r are natural numbers and a and b are not squares? I like the question!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
DocZaius said:
So to clarify since I see people keep giving fractions as proposed answers:

Is there an r = √a + √b where a, b, and r are natural numbers and a and b are not squares. I like the question!
Yes, that's right.
 
  • #11
The answer is no, unless you allow negative square roots. ##a## and ##b## being non square integers mean they have at least one prime factor of odd degree. We may assume ##a## itself has only pairwise distinct primes (i.e. ##1## as their power).
So we get ##a = (\sqrt{a})^2 = (r - \sqrt{b})^2 = r^2 + b - 2r\sqrt{b}## which can only hold for square numbers ##b##.
But then ##a## is a natural number and the square root of single primes, which cannot be.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ProfuselyQuarky and micromass
  • #12
DocZaius said:
So to clarify since I see people keep giving fractions as proposed answers:

Is there an r = √a + √b where a, b, and r are natural numbers and a and b are not squares? I like the question!
Ah, I missed the word "natural" in the OP. Sorry about that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K