Square Brackets in Partial Derivatives: Meaning & Examples

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter countable
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
countable
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
What do the square brackets represent in the expressions below:

[tex]\partial_{[\mu}\partial_{\nu}A_{\rho ]}[/tex]

[tex]\partial_{[\mu}F_{\nu\rho ]}[/tex]

I'm guessing they aren't commutators?

thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dextercioby said:
Index total antisymmetrization. This means that the <objects> in the LHS of

[tex]T_{\mu\nu\rho} = \partial_{[\mu}\partial_{\nu}A_{\rho ]}[/tex]

and

[tex]R_{\mu\nu\rho} = \partial_{[\mu}F_{\nu\rho ]}[/tex]

are totally antisymmetric in the 3 indices they have.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisymmetric_tensor

Thanks for the reply. So they are both antisymmetric tensors - by this do we simply mean that [tex]F_{\mu\nu}=-F_{\nu\mu}[/tex]?

Also would I be right in saying that the square brackets mean cyclic permutations thus:

[tex]T_{\mu\nu\rho} = \partial_{[\mu}\partial_{\nu}A_{\rho ]} = \partial_\mu \partial_\nu \partial_\rho + \partial_\nu \partial_\rho \partial_\mu + \partial_\rho \partial_\mu \partial_\nu[/tex]
 
This last part is not true, because the desired antisymmetrization is not achieved: if you shuffle indices in the RHS, you can't obtain that, e.g.

[tex]T_{\mu\nu\rho} = - T_{\nu\mu\rho}[/tex].

In other words, you normally have to have terms with - (minus) in the sum in the RHS.