MHB Square Root Solutions for Complex Numbers

Thread starter Milly
Start date Apr 17, 2015
Tags

Roots Square

AI Thread Summary

The discussion focuses on finding square roots of complex numbers, specifically addressing part (ii) of a problem. A participant mentions obtaining the result 3$e^{\frac{1}{6}\theta i}$, prompting clarification on whether it should be 3$e^{\frac{1}{6}\pi i}$. The correct square roots of a complex number in polar form are identified as $\sqrt re^{\frac12\theta i}$ and $\sqrt re^{(\frac12\theta + \pi) i}$. This highlights the importance of accurately applying the polar representation of complex numbers in calculations. The conversation emphasizes the nuances in determining square roots of complex expressions.

Apr 17, 2015

Milly

View attachment 4273Helppp for part (ii). I got 3$e^{\frac{1}{6}\theta i}$

Mathematics news on Phys.org

Apr 17, 2015

Opalg

Gold Member

MHB

Milly said:

Helppp for part (ii). I got 3$e^{\frac{1}{6}\theta i}$ Do you mean $\color{red}{3e^{\frac{1}{6}\pi i}}$?

The two square roots of $re^{\theta i}$ are $\sqrt re^{\frac12\theta i}$ and $\sqrt re^{(\frac12\theta+ \pi) i}$.

Thread 'Fixing Things Which Can Go Wrong With Complex Numbers'

Greg tells me the feature to generate a new insight announcement is broken, so I am doing this: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/fixing-things-which-can-go-wrong-with-complex-numbers/

View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

View full post »