Srednicki Ch90: How to Identify Electromagnetic Gauge Field

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LAHLH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Srednicki
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 2K views
LAHLH
Messages
405
Reaction score
2
Does anyone know exactly how Srednicki identitifies the electromagnetic gauge field with his [itex]l,r,b[/itex] fields. I know he is trying to match covariant derivatives, i.e.

[itex]D_{\mu} p=(\partial_{\mu}-il_{\mu})p[/itex] with [itex]D_{\mu} p=(\partial_{\mu}-ieA_{\mu})p[/itex]

and that he has set [itex]l_{\mu}=l_{\mu}^a T^a+b_{\mu}[/itex]

and also match [itex]D_{\mu} n=(\partial_{\mu}-ir_{\mu})n[/itex] with [itex]D_{\mu} n=(\partial_{\mu})n[/itex]

and that he has set [itex]r_{\mu}=r_{\mu}^a T^a+b_{\mu}[/itex]

But I don't seem to be able to work out the fine print of arriving at (90.20):

[tex]eA_{\mu}=l^3_{\mu}+r_{\mu}^3+1/2b_{\mu}[/tex]

from these.

I guess it must be quite simple, and I thought maybe I should just expand the [itex]T^{a}[/itex] gens in terms of Pauli then solve simultaneously, but this didn't quite seem to work out..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I seem to be finding:

[tex]D_{\mu} p=\partial_{\mu} p-\frac{i}{2}\left[(l_{\mu}^2+r_{\mu}^1)n-i(l_{\mu}^2+r_{\mu}^2)n+(l_{\mu}^3+r_{\mu}^3+2b_{\mu}) p\right][/tex]

and

[tex]D_{\mu} n=\partial_{\mu} n-\frac{i}{2}\left[(l_{\mu}^2+r_{\mu}^1)p+i(l_{\mu}^2+r_{\mu}^2)p+(l_{\mu}^3+r_{\mu}^3+2b_{\mu}) n\right][/tex]

when what I want to demand consistency with is

[tex]D_{\mu}p=\partial_{\mu}p-ieA_{\mu}p[/tex]
and
[tex]D_{\mu}n=\partial n[/tex]

and Srednicki says to do this I need to demand [itex]eA_{\mu}=l^3_{\mu}+r_{\mu}^3+1/2b_{\mu}[/itex]

Anyone tell me where I am going wrong?