Propagator for traceless gauge field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the gluon propagator as presented in Sidney Coleman's "Aspects of Symmetry," specifically in Chapter ## \frac{1}{N} ##. The equation provided, ## A^a_{\mu b}(x)A^c_{\nu d}(y)=\left( \delta^a_d \delta^c_b-\frac{1}{N} \delta^a_b \delta^c_d \right) D_{\mu \nu}(x-y) ##, highlights the traceless nature of the gluon field. The participants seek clarity on the transition between this notation and the standard notation, which yields the propagator as ## -i\delta_{ab} D_{\mu\nu} ##, questioning whether the differences arise solely from notation or if they indicate a deeper theoretical distinction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gauge theory and its mathematical framework.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of traceless matrices and their implications in quantum field theory.
  • Knowledge of the fundamental and adjoint representations in SU(N) groups.
  • Proficiency in tensor notation and manipulation in theoretical physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the gluon propagator in different notations, focusing on the implications of tracelessness.
  • Explore the properties of SU(N) groups and their representations, particularly in the context of gauge theories.
  • Investigate the normalization conditions for generators in gauge theories, specifically the trace relations.
  • Examine Sidney Coleman's "Aspects of Symmetry" for deeper insights into the role of symmetry in quantum field theory.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, gauge theories, and particle physics. It provides insights into the subtleties of notation and mathematical representation in advanced theoretical frameworks.

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
I'm reading the ## \frac 1 N ## chapter of Sidney Coleman's "Aspects of Symmetry". Equation 3.5, gives the gluon propagator as below:
## A^a_{\mu b}(x)A^c_{\nu d}(y)=\left( \delta^a_d \delta^c_b-\frac 1 N \delta^a_b \delta^c_d \right) D_{\mu \nu}(x-y)##.
Then he explains that the term proportional to ## \frac 1 N ## is there because gluon field is traceless. But his notation is not standard and in the standard notation (## A^a_{\mu b}\to A_\mu=A^a_\mu T^a ##), the gluon propagator is ## -i\delta_{ab} D_{\mu\nu}##.
I want to know how can I get from the propagator in one notation to another because the latter propagator has no term in it that seem to come from the gauge fields being traceless.
Is it really because of the notation? Or is it something deeper?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shayan.J said:
I'm reading the ## \frac 1 N ## chapter of Sidney Coleman's "Aspects of Symmetry". Equation 3.5, gives the gluon propagator as below:
## A^a_{\mu b}(x)A^c_{\nu d}(y)=\left( \delta^a_d \delta^c_b-\frac 1 N \delta^a_b \delta^c_d \right) D_{\mu \nu}(x-y)##.
Then he explains that the term proportional to ## \frac 1 N ## is there because gluon field is traceless. But his notation is not standard and in the standard notation (## A^a_{\mu b}\to A_\mu=A^a_\mu T^a ##), the gluon propagator is ## -i\delta_{ab} D_{\mu\nu}##.
I want to know how can I get from the propagator in one notation to another because the latter propagator has no term in it that seem to come from the gauge fields being traceless.
Is it really because of the notation? Or is it something deeper?
Thanks

Pay attention to the indices: The fundamental representation indices a , b = 1, 2 , \cdots , N, and the adjoint representation indices A , B = 1 , 2 , \cdots , N^{2}-1. The gauge field (Hermitian, traceless) matrix, in any representation, is given by \mathbb{A}_{\mu}(x) = A^{B}_{\mu}(x) T^{B} . The matrix elements of \mathbb{A}_{\mu} in the fundamental representation are, therefore, given by \left(\mathbb{A}_{\mu}(x) \right)^{a}{}_{b} = A^{B}_{\mu}(x) (T^{B})^{a}{}_{b} . So \langle \left(\mathbb{A}_{\mu}(x) \right)^{a}{}_{b} \ \left(\mathbb{A}_{\nu}(y) \right)^{c}{}_{d} \rangle = \langle A^{B}_{\mu}(x) \ A^{C}_{\nu}(y) \rangle \ (T^{B})^{a}{}_{b} (T^{C})^{c}{}_{d} . Using \langle A^{B}_{\mu}(x) \ A^{C}_{\nu}(y) \rangle \sim \delta^{BC} \mathcal{D}_{\mu\nu}(x - y) , you get \langle \left(\mathbb{A}_{\mu}(x) \right)^{a}{}_{b} \ \left(\mathbb{A}_{\nu}(y) \right)^{c}{}_{d} \rangle \sim (T^{B})^{a}{}_{b} \ (T^{B})^{c}{}_{d} \ \mathcal{D}_{\mu\nu}(x - y) .
The result follows from the SU(N)-identity (T^{B})^{a}{}_{b} \ (T^{B})^{c}{}_{d} = \delta^{a}_{d}\delta^{c}_{b} - \frac{1}{N} \delta^{a}_{b}\delta^{c}_{d} , which I have derived some where on PF, with the normalization \mbox{Tr}(T^{A}T^{B}) = \delta^{AB}. You can always find the thing you need in one of my posts on PF :wink:.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShayanJ, vanhees71 and dextercioby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K