Star of Bethlehem: Cosmic Event, Comet, Nova or UFO?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the identity of the Star of Bethlehem, with theories ranging from astronomical events like comets or planetary conjunctions to supernatural interpretations. Many participants suggest that the Magi, known as astrologers, may have interpreted celestial occurrences, such as the conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in Pisces around 7 BC, as signs of a significant birth. However, there are debates regarding the visibility and positioning of these celestial events, questioning how they could guide the Magi to Bethlehem. Additionally, some argue that the star could symbolize astrological allegory rather than a literal astronomical phenomenon. The conversation highlights the intersection of astronomy, astrology, and biblical narratives in understanding this historical event.
  • #31
arildno said:
Happy Yuletide and sun-return to all of you! :smile:
omg, that is so Northern-hemispherist-centric.:-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Baywax, I'd certainly buy a loose-language/backhanded reference to an astrological event. I've suspected something like that since it's not the first time I've seen reference to an "alignment" that isn't even close. All that can really be said is that all the visible planets are in the same quarter of the sky (which is still a remarkable event).
 
  • #33
russ_watters said:
I don't know if astronmers actually use it, but it's a navigation term: Closest Point of Approach.

Anyway, weird, but I may have gotten the wrong year there (they were similarly aligned 6AD on that date). Apparently, there was a solar eclipse on April 18th, but not for viewers in Israel. Here is roughly what they would have seen (if the sun had been eclipsed - since it is zoomed-out, the moon and sun sizes are exaggerated). Location: Tel Aviv. Still pretty cool.
Wow! That is pretty awesome. Not an alignment obviously, so it's hard to imagine anyone would call it a star, but it's still pretty impressive! Also, being mid-day, I imagine nothing would have been visible for people not in the umbra. Where would you have had to have been to see the solar eclipse?
 
  • #34
russ_watters said:
Baywax, I'd certainly buy a loose-language/backhanded reference to an astrological event. I've suspected something like that since it's not the first time I've seen reference to an "alignment" that isn't even close. All that can really be said is that all the visible planets are in the same quarter of the sky (which is still a remarkable event).

Right on Russ... its a bit mystifying that the eastern account of the "magi" is the number 12... right in line with the number of zodiacs... perhaps there were no "visitors" other than a zodiacal conjunction/alignment/eclipse/comet etc... The zodiacs were, after all, considered kings and gods and animal spirits etc... and still are.. in some circles.

I'd still like to try to debunk the high and mighty claims surrounding astrology to the base level of physics, gravity and other influences on the rather weakened susceptibility of mammalian cellular physiology. (ie: full moon drives us looney, retrograde Mars causes accidents and so on) Is there already a thread on this?
 
  • #35
Gokul43201 said:
Also, being mid-day, I imagine nothing would have been visible for people not in the umbra. Where would you have had to have been to see the solar eclipse?
Thats not an easy thing to ascertain from Starry Night - I can't even be sure there was an umbra. It looked close to total from Philly though, so if there was, it was probably within a few thousand miles of there.
 
  • #36
Two words:::

Ball

Lightning
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K