Stars Burning in Space: Unanswered Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter MRCHEM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space Stars
AI Thread Summary
Stars do not burn in space like fire does because there is no oxygen; instead, they undergo nuclear fusion. This process involves the fusion of light elements, primarily hydrogen, into heavier elements like helium, releasing vast amounts of energy. The Sun is a prime example of a star that utilizes fusion to produce light and heat. Understanding nuclear fusion is key to grasping how stars generate energy. The discussion emphasizes the distinction between combustion and the nuclear processes that power stars.
MRCHEM
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
how come stars burn at space if there is no oxygen in space?:confused:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
and also the sun?
 
Yes. The sun is our local star.
 
oooh fusion yess.. what's that i can't understand the link above
 
Nuclear fusion is the process of combining light nuclei, like hydrogen, into heavier nuclei, like helium. The process releases energy.

- Warren
 

Thread 'Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes?'

TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
View full post »
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
View full post »

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Why Does Gravity Remain when Star Mass Dissipates?
Replies
10
Views
2K
B Question about Neon-burning Process
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Why Do Nebulae only have Hydrogen, Oxygen and Sulfur?
Replies
4
Views
1K
B What happens to the Core of a main sequence star as additional mass is added?
Replies
42
Views
4K
I The Heavier Elements: A Question About Their Abundance
Replies
28
Views
3K
I J0524-0336, surprisingly high Li concentration
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Why on Earth do we not see older stars close to us?
Replies
3
Views
2K
B What keeps most galactic stars from falling into the centeral black hole?
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Neutron star 4U 1820-30 spins at 716 revolutions per second
Replies
0
Views
2K
B Feasibility of Sending a Radio Signal Detectable from a Neighboring Star
Replies
5
Views
159

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top