Career impact of discussing WikiLeaks online

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
Sign up Log in
133 replies · 17K views
I think the original statement of advice was more along the lines of; if you support the idea of wikileaks, and that's on record, how can future companies trust that you won't leak their secrets?

Which is a valid point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Onion reports some of the things that have been revealed in the leaks:

  • In 2008, Nicolas Sarkozy gave everyone else iPods for Christmas, but U.S. diplomats received candles
  • Kim Jong-il is registered with the Writers Guild of America under the pseudonym "Roland Emmerich"
  • Rahm Emanuel brushes his teeth if he eats so much as a snack
  • Since the first day of his tenure, U.K. prime minister David Cameron has lobbied the Queen to knight Spacemen 3 as a band
  • Threats and aid offers equally ineffective in forcing Vladimir Putin to put a shirt on during diplomatic negotiations
  • Ahmadinejad has a closet with, like, 200 of those jackets
  • The majority of diplomatic relations with Israel still go through comatose former prime minister Ariel Sharon
  • U.S. diplomatic privacy measures are terrible
 
lisab said:
  • Ahmadinejad has a closet with, like, 200 of those jackets

That in itself should be grounds for UN sanctions. Come on, Ahmadinejad, even Fidel mixes it up a little bit. Who started this wear-the-same-outfit-always trend among dictator types? Stalin?
 
Not particularly concerned myself, since I don't want to work for the military industrial complex.
Also, not particularly surprised the state department is trying help clean up the mess by fear-mongering :)
 
Evo said:
Wrong, the information remains classified until the US Government goes through the process of declassifying them. Are you thinking that that an illegal upload to the internet declassified them?

An illegal upload to the internet certainly made them discussable in the public sphere. In my mind at least.

People shouldn't be worried about not getting jobs based on the fact that they discussed something to do with the government online, that's just bogus. And I don't support the leak for the record.

++Why's my name pink.
 
zomgwtf said:
++Why's my name pink.

You're a PF contributor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
zomgwtf said:
An illegal upload to the internet certainly made them discussable in the public sphere. In my mind at least.
Ah, is that what people are confused about? No, you can look at the papers in the news, that's no problem. They are still classified documents however, so you should not go to one of the servers illegally hosting them and download them.

People shouldn't be worried about not getting jobs based on the fact that they discussed something to do with the government online, that's just bogus.
That's why we have discussions here. of course there is discussion then there is saying something stupid that might come back to haunt you, just don't post things that you might not want the world to see at some point in your life.[/QUOTE]
 
Evo said:
That's why we have discussions here. of course there is discussion then there is saying something stupid that might come back to haunt you, just don't post things that you might not want the world to see at some point in your life.
[/QUOTE]

That is reasonable advice. I suspect most people think most employers will not go beyond a superficial look at one's online life. Personally, I do not think the average employer will invest significant amounts of time or money searching for my revolutionary postings.
 
Mathnomalous said:
That is reasonable advice. I suspect most people think most employers will not go beyond a superficial look at one's online life. Personally, I do not think the average employer will invest significant amounts of time or money searching for my revolutionary postings.
Actually, the new thing is for employers to use screening companies that are expert at doing web searches on people. I was reading an article on this recently.
 
I *heard* something similar but I did not give it much importance at the time. I does not surprise, however. Are these companies matching IP addresses with geographical addresses or mostly limited to names provided to the company?

I am not necessarily worried about any political comments I make online, but I would be concerned about my NSFW postings elsewhere. :shy:
 
Mathnomalous said:
I *heard* something similar but I did not give it much importance at the time. I does not surprise, however. Are these companies matching IP addresses with geographical addresses or mostly limited to names provided to the company?

I am not necessarily worried about any political comments I make online, but I would be concerned about my NSFW postings elsewhere. :shy:
They mentioned all kinds of things, a lot of employers will have you go online to answer questions, they ask for your e-mail address. Even if you have Facebook set to "private" do you have a friend that has posted something of yours on their page, and did a friend of theirs respond to it, so it's now on a page that you aren't even aware of? They had all kinds of tricks, they look up stuff from school and track you down that way. They posted examples of some of the stuff that was found. If I can find the article, I'll post it.
 
Proton Soup said:
lesson learned, keep clean email addresses

Well, keep one clean address o:)