States & Observables: Are They Really Different?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between states and observables in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing whether a density matrix can be considered an observable. Both states and observables are represented by Hermitian operators, but they serve different roles: states describe preparation procedures while observables correspond to measurable quantities. The density matrix, although Hermitian, does not function as an observable because it lacks the structural properties of basic observables. The conversation emphasizes the practical implications of these differences in quantum theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with density matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of quantum measurement theory and observables
  • Basic concepts of quantum state preparation and quantum tomography
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the role of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Study the process of quantum tomography for state inference
  • Investigate the implications of the Heisenberg picture in quantum theory
  • Learn about the relationship between entropy and quantum states
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum computing, and students studying quantum mechanics who seek to deepen their understanding of the fundamental differences between states and observables.

  • #31
Morbert said:
What would the spectral decomposition of this matrix be? I.e. Could you write it as S^=∑S|S⟩⟨S|?
Say entropy is an observable in QM, in general for the set of same states, observed value differs in each observation, so
\sigma_S^2=<S^2>-<S>^2 \neq 0
What are the eigenstates of entropy? I do not know whether e.g., superpositon of systems of T=0, T_1, T_2 are valid statement or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Here's my crude attempt at framing Shannon entropy as an observable to be measured, motivated by this paper. Consider first an experiment to measure the observable ##A## of a system with state space ##\mathcal{H}## prepared in the state ##\rho##. What we actually want to measure is not ##A##, but the Shannon entropy of this experiment.

First we model multiple experimental runs by creating a new state space that is a product of ##N## copies of the original state space $$\mathcal{H'} = \mathcal{H}\otimes\mathcal{H}\otimes\mathcal{H}\otimes\dots$$This allows us to frame the relative frequencies of multiple experimental runs as a single observable, such that a single outcome is an observed set of relative frequencies ##\{f_i\}## with probability $$p(\{f_i\}) = \mathrm{tr}\rho'\Pi_{\{f_i\}}$$ For a standard experiment, and for a large enough ##N##, the probability for a particular set of relative frequencies should be close to 1. The relative frequencies are the observed frequencies, and will approximate the set of probabilities ##\{p_i\}## determined by ##\rho## and ##A##. You can then compute Shannon entropy the usual way from these probabilities.

To emphasise: Shannon entropy seems to be more an objective property of the experiment than a property of the microscopic system to be measured.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gentzen, vanhees71, anuttarasammyak and 1 other person
  • #33
Formally entropy is not an observable. This is clear from the formal definition a la von Neumann,
$$S=-\mathrm{Tr}(\hat{\rho} \ln \hat{\rho}),$$
i.e., it is a property of the state rather than a state-independent observable.

Also the above assertions concerning thermodynamic entropy don't show that you can "measure" entropy dircectly. What's quoted from Wikipedia above, i.e., measuring entropy differences by measuring ##\mathrm{d} S=-\delta Q/T##, where ##Q## is the heat energy in the system, is indeed only indirect and only valid for the special case of equilibrium.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LittleSchwinger

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K