States & Observables: Are They Really Different?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conceptual and formal differences between states and observables in quantum theory. Participants explore whether density matrices can be considered observables and the implications of their mathematical properties and physical meanings.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that both states and observables are represented by Hermitian operators, questioning the fundamental differences between them.
  • Others argue that density matrices, while Hermitian, do not correspond to physical quantities in the same way observables do, as they describe preparation procedures rather than measurable quantities.
  • A participant suggests that the process of inferring a quantum state could be seen as more complex than measuring an observable, proposing a distinction based on the inference process involved.
  • There is a discussion about the physical meaning of observables and states, with some emphasizing that observables can be measured while states represent initial conditions.
  • One participant raises the idea of entropy as a property of the state, questioning whether it can be treated as an observable.
  • Another participant challenges the notion that entropy can be directly linked to an observable, emphasizing its role as a measure of missing information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether density matrices can be considered observables, with no consensus reached. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of their mathematical similarities and physical interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity regarding the definitions and roles of states and observables, as well as the implications of their mathematical properties. The discussion reflects a variety of interpretations and assumptions that remain unaddressed.

  • #31
Morbert said:
What would the spectral decomposition of this matrix be? I.e. Could you write it as S^=∑S|S⟩⟨S|?
Say entropy is an observable in QM, in general for the set of same states, observed value differs in each observation, so
\sigma_S^2=<S^2>-<S>^2 \neq 0
What are the eigenstates of entropy? I do not know whether e.g., superpositon of systems of T=0, T_1, T_2 are valid statement or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Here's my crude attempt at framing Shannon entropy as an observable to be measured, motivated by this paper. Consider first an experiment to measure the observable ##A## of a system with state space ##\mathcal{H}## prepared in the state ##\rho##. What we actually want to measure is not ##A##, but the Shannon entropy of this experiment.

First we model multiple experimental runs by creating a new state space that is a product of ##N## copies of the original state space $$\mathcal{H'} = \mathcal{H}\otimes\mathcal{H}\otimes\mathcal{H}\otimes\dots$$This allows us to frame the relative frequencies of multiple experimental runs as a single observable, such that a single outcome is an observed set of relative frequencies ##\{f_i\}## with probability $$p(\{f_i\}) = \mathrm{tr}\rho'\Pi_{\{f_i\}}$$ For a standard experiment, and for a large enough ##N##, the probability for a particular set of relative frequencies should be close to 1. The relative frequencies are the observed frequencies, and will approximate the set of probabilities ##\{p_i\}## determined by ##\rho## and ##A##. You can then compute Shannon entropy the usual way from these probabilities.

To emphasise: Shannon entropy seems to be more an objective property of the experiment than a property of the microscopic system to be measured.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gentzen, vanhees71, anuttarasammyak and 1 other person
  • #33
Formally entropy is not an observable. This is clear from the formal definition a la von Neumann,
$$S=-\mathrm{Tr}(\hat{\rho} \ln \hat{\rho}),$$
i.e., it is a property of the state rather than a state-independent observable.

Also the above assertions concerning thermodynamic entropy don't show that you can "measure" entropy dircectly. What's quoted from Wikipedia above, i.e., measuring entropy differences by measuring ##\mathrm{d} S=-\delta Q/T##, where ##Q## is the heat energy in the system, is indeed only indirect and only valid for the special case of equilibrium.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LittleSchwinger

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K