Statistical Mechanics-Limit in canonical ensemble

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the conditions under which the exponential function can be approximated in the context of statistical mechanics, particularly in the canonical ensemble at low temperatures. It emphasizes that the approximation \( e^x \approx 1 + x \) is valid only when \( |x| \ll 1 \). As temperature approaches zero, the argument of the exponential, given by \( \beta E_j \), becomes large for any \( j > 0 \), leading to \( e^{-\beta E_j} \) approaching zero. Consequently, only the terms for \( j = 0 \) and \( j = 1 \) in the partition function \( Z \) are significant. Understanding the magnitudes of physical constants like the moment of inertia is crucial for determining when to apply this approximation.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



question attached.

rotsm.jpg
My question is just about the size of the limit, how do you know whether to expand out the exponential or not (parts 2) and 4))

Homework Equations



for small ##x## we can expand out ##e^{x} ## via taylor series.

The Attempt at a Solution



Solutions given here for parts 2) and 4) respectively. (not full sol but only as relevant as needed for the question):
rot2sol.jpg
rot4sol.jpg


For parts 2) and 4) below I would have used the same approximation ##1+3e^{x}##, but would have expanded out the exponential as ##1+x##.

I'm just wondering how you know whether or not to expand this out or not, going by 'low ##T## many thanks.
 

Attachments

  • rotsm.jpg
    rotsm.jpg
    44.2 KB · Views: 934
  • rot2sol.jpg
    rot2sol.jpg
    17 KB · Views: 790
  • rot4sol.jpg
    rot4sol.jpg
    26.8 KB · Views: 862
Physics news on Phys.org
binbagsss said:
For parts 2) and 4) below I would have used the same approximation ##1+3e^{x}##, but would have expanded out the exponential as ##1+x##.

I'm just wondering how you know whether or not to expand this out or not, going by 'low ##T## many thanks.
The approximation ##e^x \approx 1 + x## is only valid if ##x## is "small" (i.e., ##|x| \ll 1##).

For low ##T##, is the argument of the exponential small in any of the terms of ##Z## (other than the ##j = 0## term)?
 
TSny said:
The approximation ##e^x \approx 1 + x## is only valid if ##x## is "small" (i.e., ##|x| \ll 1##).

For low ##T##, is the argument of the exponential small in any of the terms of ##Z## (other than the ##j = 0## term)?

would you not have to know an approx magnitude of the moment of inertia to know this? or should we be looking at planks constant, and Boltzmann constant, and physically feasible magnitudes of the moment of inertia, i hae no idea what these would be , and know they arent comparable so x is not small?
 
The exponential factors in ##Z## have the form ##e^{-\beta E_j}##, where ##\beta E_j = \frac{\hbar^2 j(j+1)}{2 I k T}##.
As ##T## →0, ##\beta E_j## gets large (for any ##j > 0##). So, ##e^{-\beta E_j}## → 0 for any for any ##j > 0##. The approximation ##e^x \approx 1+x## doesn't apply here. The larger the value of ##j##, the faster ##e^{-\beta E_j}## → 0. So, as an approximation, you can keep just the ##j = 0## and ##j = 1## terms in ##Z##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 309 ·
11
Replies
309
Views
16K
Replies
2
Views
4K