Statistical Physics: Proving "if p(a)=p(b)=p then p(ab) ≤ p^2

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the statement "if p(a)=p(b)=p then p(ab) ≤ p^2" within the context of statistical physics and probability theory. Participants are exploring the implications of this statement regarding the probabilities of events a and b, and the relationship between their joint probability.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of p(ab) and whether events a and b are independent or disjoint. There are attempts to clarify the definitions and implications of the probabilities involved, as well as questions about the assumptions that can be made regarding the events.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have suggested specific cases, such as when a and b are mutually exclusive or independent, but there is no consensus on a general proof. Guidance has been offered to consider different scenarios and the implications of independence.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem lacks specific constraints or information about the relationship between events a and b, which complicates the proof. There is also mention of the need for clarity in notation to avoid confusion.

  • #31
Where are you going with this?
Assuming independence will change the problem.
We already covered that.
You don't know anything about P(a|b), so it can be anywhere from 0 to 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rangatudugala
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
sorry .. i dnt kw homework to prove this .. there may be a mistake some where or i dnt know nothing

Thanks for your help.. Ill try next prob
 
  • #33
I have already told you a few times how to prove it.
If it were true that " if P(a) =P(b) =p then P(a ∩ b) ≤ p2" then the relation would have to hold for all values of p and all a and b such that P(a) =P(b) =p.
You have shown that it is true for independent a and b, and for mutually exclusive a and b. I will also add in that it is true for certain p =1.
It is certainly not true for any a and b such that 0<p<1 and p(a|b) > p.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rangatudugala
  • #34
rangatudugala said:
independent
also P(a/b) = P(a)* P(a ∩ b) / P(b) ---> 3
P(b/a) = P(b)* P(a ∩ b) / P(a) ---> 4
Are you sure about this?
Your notation P(a/b) means probability of a given b, right?

This implies that P(a/b) = P(a ∩ b). Shouldn't it just be P(a/b) = P(a ∩ b) / P(b)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rangatudugala
  • #35
RUber said:
Are you sure about this?
Your notation P(a/b) means probability of a given b, right?

This implies that P(a/b) = P(a ∩ b). Shouldn't it just be P(a/b) = P(a ∩ b) / P(b)?
P(a/b) means probability of a given b, right? yes its true

how come this possible ?P(a/b) = P(a ∩ b) / P(b)
 
  • #36
rangatudugala said:
how come this possible ?P(a/b) = P(a ∩ b) / P(b)
That's what it is.
 
  • #37
You have the probability of a given b, so you are only looking at the subset of the possibilities where b has already happened. If the events are independent, the P(a ∩ b)=P(a)P(b), similarly P(a|b) = P(a). Test these against the formula, and you will see how it is true.
 
  • #38
1ba46ff8b3cbad33a7c8eead937c8d34.png


99b11ba7fe4ec33be7a129cf182a32d2.png
 
  • #39
rangatudugala said:
1ba46ff8b3cbad33a7c8eead937c8d34.png


[PLAIN]https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/9/9/b/99b11ba7fe4ec33be7a129cf182a32d2.png[/QUOTE]

Your formula ##P(A \cap B) = P(A) \, P(B)## is NOT a general, true formula; it is true if and only if ##A## and ##B## are "independent" events, such as getting 'heads' on toss 1 of a coin and getting 'tails' on toss 2, or successive particle emissions from a radioactive element. There are millions of real-world examples where it is false. (Or, maybe I mis-read the intent of your post, in which case you might have left out some crucial clarifying information.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #40
Do you not know that "P(a or b)= P(a)+ P(b)- P(a and b)"?

Also, way back in post #5, Ruber asked what "ab" meant and you never answered. Is it "a and b" or "a or b"?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rangatudugala
  • #41
HallsofIvy said:
Do you not know that "P(a or b)= P(a)+ P(b)- P(a and b)"?

Also, way back in post #5, Ruber asked what "ab" meant and you never answered. Is it "a and b" or "a or b"?
I hv already answered. probably you didn't see

here rewritten the question
prove or disprove the following
p(a) = P(b) = p (let say some valve, you can use what ever symbol ) then p(a ∩ b) ≤ p^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K