Statistical test for spherical uniformity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on assessing the uniformity of a large sample of vectors in 3-dimensional space, specifically regarding their angular distribution across spherical shells. The chi-square test is recommended for discrete distributions, while continuous uniform distributions may require alternative statistical tests. The user aims to validate the assumption of spherical uniformity for tracking spatial density over time, emphasizing the need to analyze variations in object distribution within defined volume cells. The book "Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data" by N. I. Fisher is cited as a potential resource for further insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chi-square tests for categorical data analysis
  • Familiarity with continuous uniform distributions in statistics
  • Knowledge of spatial density concepts in three-dimensional space
  • Basic principles of statistical analysis of spherical data
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of chi-square tests in discrete data scenarios
  • Explore alternative statistical tests for continuous uniform distributions
  • Study spatial density estimation techniques in three-dimensional environments
  • Read "Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data" by N. I. Fisher for advanced methodologies
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in statistics, data analysts working with spatial data, and anyone interested in understanding the distribution of vectors in three-dimensional space.

belliott4488
Messages
661
Reaction score
1
I have a large sample of vectors in 3-space, and I would like to how uniformly they are distributed. Ultimately I'd like to know how uniform the angular distribution as a function of magnitude. What I mean by that is that if I divide the space into spherical shells, will the vectors whose magnitudes fall into each shell be distributed uniformly throughout the shell?

Thanks for any suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you provide a little more detail?

Is each shell also divided into discrete subregions? If so, that makes it a discrete problem and you can use the chi-square test: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi-square_test

If you are looking at it as a continuous uniform distribution, then you cannot use categorical tests such as chi-squared, but may be able to use other tests.
 
The problem I'm looking at is fairly straight-forward. I have a large number of objects all moving from one point in space with some distribution of velocity vectors. I'd like to track the spatial density of objects over time, and it's easier to do this if I can make the assumption that the objects are uniformly distributed spherically. That way I can just divide my space into spherical shells of uniform thickness and count the number of objects in each shell to get the density at that radius. My simplification amounts to saying that the density will be a function of radial distance, but not of direction.

I'd like to know how valid this assumption is, however. Since I have a discrete set of vectors, then of necessity I would likely divide each shell into cells of equal volume in order to test the assumption. In that case, then I think I'm just asking how much variation there is in the number of objects per cell for a given radius.

In any case, since I posted my original question, I've gotten my hands on a book entitled, "Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data" by N. I. Fisher et. al. Hm. If the answer isn't in there, I'll eat my hat.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K