Statistics Question: Probability of Diamonds in a Deck

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating probabilities related to drawing cards from a standard 52-card deck. The probability of drawing three diamonds is calculated as (13/52) * (12/51) * (11/50), resulting in 11/850. The probability of drawing no diamonds is determined similarly, yielding (39/52) * (38/51) * (37/50). The third part, which asks for the probability that not all cards are diamonds, is clarified as not being the direct opposite of the first part, indicating a need for careful consideration of mutually exclusive events.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability concepts
  • Familiarity with combinatorial calculations
  • Knowledge of the structure of a standard deck of cards
  • Ability to apply conditional probability
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of conditional probability in depth
  • Learn about combinatorial probability and its applications
  • Explore the concept of mutually exclusive events in probability theory
  • Practice problems involving card probabilities and combinations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying probability theory, educators teaching statistics, and anyone interested in understanding card game probabilities.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Three cards are dealt from a well-shuffled deck.

(a) Find the chance that all of the cards are diamonds.
(b) Find the chance that none of the cards are diamonds.
(b) Find the chance that the cards are not all diamonds.

Homework Equations



Not sure ...

The Attempt at a Solution



There are 52 cards in a deck. The chance of one being a diamond is 13/52. If you know that one card you were dealt is a diamond, then the chance of another being a diamond is 12/51, since there is 1 less card and 1 less diamond. And if you that two cards are diamonds, then the chance of a third being a diamond is 11/50. The chance of 3 cards being diamonds is therefore (13/52)*(12/51)*(11/50). Part (b) can be solved similarly. This time the chance is 39/52, then 38/51, then 37/50, and the chance of the three happening is (39/52)*(38/51)*(37/51). Part (c) is simply the opposite of part (a).

Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you have this all worked out to me. You have the probabilities for each stage correct, and multiplying the three together should lower the probability to show the probability of the two states, and then three. It looks good to me.

I came up with 11/850 for part(a) using that method.

I'm not sure that I entirely understand part(c).
"Find the chance that the cards are not all diamonds."

Sounds like this one is a little different. If the first card is a diamond, so it the second, but the third is not, it would still satisfy this condition right? I think this one is asking "What are the chances that none of the cards will be a diamond, and all of the cards will not be diamonds"

I don't think it's the opposite of part(a) as you mentioned.
 
Last edited:
I'm just confused because this chapter was supposed to be about adding things that are mutually exclusive.
 
I don't know what the chapter was supposed to be about, but I don't really see any other solution.

Not all the cards are diamonds...

So let's think of this in three cases.
In case 1, let's say the card cannot be a diamond
(3/4) right?

Let's also assume that because cases 1 and 2 will fulfill the "not all be diamonds" requirement, case three can be anything.
(1/1)

so what would case 2 have to be?
(3/4)(X/X)(1/1)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K