Steel Ball Density: Impact of Water Filling on Mercury Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter galuda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of a steel ball floating on mercury when additional water is poured into the container. It is established that the steel ball remains partially submerged in mercury but does not sink as deeply as before due to the buoyant force exerted by the water above it. This buoyant force counteracts some of the weight of the ball, leading to a decrease in its submergence in the mercury. The interaction between the densities of the materials involved—steel, mercury, and water—plays a crucial role in this phenomenon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyancy principles
  • Knowledge of density and specific gravity
  • Familiarity with fluid mechanics concepts
  • Basic physics of floating and sinking objects
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of buoyancy and Archimedes' principle
  • Explore the density values of steel, mercury, and water
  • Learn about fluid statics and pressure distribution in fluids
  • Investigate the effects of additional weight on floating objects
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching fluid mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of buoyancy and density interactions in fluids.

galuda
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a steel ball floating on the surface of mercury in a half-filled container. What happens when the rest of the container is filled with water?


The Attempt at a Solution



Wouldn't the ball sink a little farther into the mercury with the added weight of the water on top of the ball? Or would it just stay where it's at? The mercury is obviously going to stay on bottom, and the steel ball is going to float in the water.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. The steel ball should sink a little bit farther into the mercury due to the pressure from the water which will be above it.
 
Well apparently the answer was the ball remains partially submerged in mercury but not as deeply as before. I'm not sure I understand why that is, but in case anyone else is wondering, that's the way it is heh.
 
Hmm. Maybe it has to do with the buoyancy of the ball. The buoyant force of the water on the ball may cancel with some of the weight, thus causing less submergence in the mercury. Maybe something like this is the case? I don't see how this can be the case is the ball is on top of the mercury and no water is beneath the ball though...I won't say anything for sure, since I am not sure if this is the case.
 
Yeah, i don't get it either.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K