Graduate Is Stochastic String Theory the Key to Original Ideas in Physics?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the potential of Stochastic String Theory as a source of original ideas in physics, sparked by a recent lecture on String Theory. A participant references a 1994 paper on the topic, questioning whether there have been any new developments in this area of research. The conversation reflects on the cyclical nature of scientific ideas, suggesting that many concepts are often revisited with slight variations. A sentiment is expressed that true originality may be elusive, with the notion that even great ideas have likely been conceived before. The dialogue highlights the ongoing challenge of innovation within established scientific frameworks.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
Well there was today some lecture on String theory which I got late since I was reading something else in Condensed matter physics and then I looked at a book that I have of stochastic Integration with jumps and by associativity of ideas I searched google for Stochastic String Theory and got to this paper:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9408088.pdf

Any new stuff from this line of research?
Well it was published in 1994, relatively new.

Some may say all the ideas repeat themselves over the years, stuck on loops...
:oldbiggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I was a member of a patent review committee, the famous mantra of our chairman:

It's a great idea, but like so many great ideas someone thought of it before. Hence the echos of ideas past, reverberate today with variations in their tone, duration and loudness.
 
jedishrfu said:
When I was a member of a patent review committee, the famous mantra of our chairman:

It's a great idea, but like so many great ideas someone thought of it before. Hence the echos of ideas past, reverberate today with variations in their tone, duration and loudness.
Can anyone be truly original? Only God, I presume... if he exists.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K