String Theory & Dimensions: Interactions Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pjpic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions String
Click For Summary
String theory posits that multiple dimensions may explain why certain particles do not interact, but the discussion highlights that these dimensions primarily stem from mathematical constructs rather than physical necessity. The challenge lies in reconciling classical string theory with quantum mechanics, as introducing interactions complicates the theory further. Achieving a consistent framework requires precise dimensionality in spacetime, yet there is no compelling physical rationale for the existence of these extra dimensions. The conversation emphasizes the gap between mathematical theory and physical interpretation in string theory. Ultimately, the relationship between dimensions and particle interactions remains a complex and unresolved issue.
Pjpic
Messages
235
Reaction score
1
Does string theory use multiple dimensions to explain why certain particles don't interact with others? If so, why wouldn't shape be used; as it is when explaining why certain proteins don't interact with cells?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I'm concerned, the multiple dimensions used in string theory have a purely mathematical origin. The problem does not arise when looking at interactions, but when trying to make "classical" string theory compatible with quantum mechanics. Adding interactions only makes things more complicated. When you do the math, you get a (more-or-less) inconsistent theory, unless the number of dimensions of spacetime is exactly right. AFAIK there is no physical argument that explains or even makes plausible why there should be so many dimensions.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 165 ·
6
Replies
165
Views
10K