String theory relativistic equations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on understanding the relativistic equations of motion in string theory, particularly how these equations relate to classical equations and the treatment of compactified dimensions. Participants explore the implications of Fourier expansion in different geometrical contexts and the role of various mathematical constructs in string theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the development of relativistic equations from classical equations and questions the role of Fourier expansion in describing string vibrations across dimensions.
  • Another participant notes that Fourier expansion is applicable in flat space and suggests that in curved spaces, normal modes differ from standard sine and cosine functions, although Fourier expansion may still suffice for small oscillations.
  • A third participant introduces the concept of geodesics in spacetime, explaining that strings trace out two-dimensional surfaces rather than one-dimensional lines, and mentions the Nambu-Goto action as a method for extremizing the surface area of these strings.
  • A different participant explains how compactifications are accounted for by imposing periodic conditions on spacetime coordinates, providing a mathematical example involving toroidal compactification and the implications for open strings.
  • It is mentioned that the treatment of Calabi-Yau compactifications is more complex but follows a similar conceptual framework as toroidal compactifications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the applicability of Fourier expansion in different geometrical contexts, and while some concepts are clarified, there is no consensus on the implications of these mathematical treatments in string theory.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption that Fourier expansion is valid in flat space and the potential complexities introduced by curved spaces and different compactification schemes, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

lkwarren01
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm an engineer trying to get a reasonable laymen's/conceptual understanding of string theory. I've finally gotten a general understanding of developing classical equations of motion, but I'm a little stuck on relativistic equations.

As I understand it, relativistic equations of motion are developed from classical equations by applying light cone coordinates then Fourier expansion. It's my understanding that there's a Fourier term for each spatial dimension of the theory, including compactified dimensions, which describes how the string vibrates in that dimension. Is that correct?

If yes, how is the geometry of the compactified dimensions--eg, C-Y, orbifold, torus, etc--taken into account? Thru the sigma variable in the Fourier term?

Thanks
Larry Warren, IL
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Fourier expansion only works in flat space, strictly speaking. The compact directions can be flat tori.

In curved spaces, the normal modes will be something other than sines and cosines. However, the Fourier expansion will be good enough for very small oscillations.
 
Have you read Zwiebach's text? That's, I think, the best text that could meet your prerequisites :)

Non-relativistically, we say that a free particle (no forces!) traces out a straight line in space. Straight lines are the shortest paths if the space is flat, which is the case in Newtonian physics. Relativistically, we extend this idea to say that particles trace out geodesics; the shortest paths in spacetime. However, usually one develops string theory in flat spacetime, where geodesics are again straight lines.

So: to determine how particles move in spacetime, we extremize the length they trace out in spacetime.

A string doesn't trace out a line (which is 1-dimensional) in spacetime, but a sheet (which is 2-dimensional). Now the idea is that the surface of this sheet is extremized. This is done by writing down the so-called Nambu-Goto action. In chapter 6 of Zwiebach you can read the details :)
 
Compactifications are taken into account by imposing periodic conditions on the spacetime coordinates which describe the compactifications.

So, if you have a 26-dimensional string theory (describing only bosons), the spacetime points are described by coordinates

[tex] x^{\mu}, \ \ \ \ \mu = 0,1,2,\ldots,25[/tex]

If you now want to compactify this theory on a torus, you can do this as follows:

[tex] x^{25} = x^{25} + 2\pi R_1 n, \ \ \ \ \ x^{24} = x^{24} + 2\pi R_2 m, \ \ \ \ n,m \in Z[/tex]

where the R's describe the two radii of the torus (we call these parameters moduli). Of course, this choice is arbitrary; we are free to choose the coordinate parametrization! But in my example I chose x^24 and x^25.

Now, an open string can wrap around this torus w times. In that case, the sigma coordinate wraps around one of the cycli of the torus (say, described by R_1), and gets the same periodic identification (in this case, the same periodic identification as x^25).

For Calabi-Yau's this becomes a bit more technical, but the idea is the same. Again: Zwiebach describes this in full detail :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K