Structure constants of a group antisymmetric?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The structure constants \( c^{k}_{ij} \) of a group are demonstrated to be antisymmetric through their definition and the properties of the commutator. According to Anderson's "Principles of Relativity Physics," the relationship between the infinitesimal mappings and the structure constants is established via equations (1), (2), and (3). Specifically, the antisymmetry is shown by the relation \( c^{k}_{ij} = -c^{k}_{ji} \), which arises naturally when interchanging indices \( i \) and \( j \) in the computation of the commutator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory and structure constants
  • Familiarity with commutators in mathematical physics
  • Knowledge of differential notation and partial derivatives
  • Access to Anderson's "Principles of Relativity Physics" for context
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lie groups and their structure constants
  • Learn about the role of commutators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore antisymmetry in mathematical structures
  • Review differential geometry concepts relevant to group theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of theoretical physics who are exploring group theory, particularly in the context of relativity and quantum mechanics.

jason12345
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
First, how do you put in spaces without them being deleted when i post?

How does one show that the structure constants, c^{k}_{ij} of a group are antisymmetric? The context is from page 12 of Anderson's "Principles of Relativity Physics", with the statement right at the bottom:


With u = 1,2,3,4 and ',' denoting partial differentiation so ,u means \frac{\partial }{\partial x^{u}}

The commutator structure of this group can be written as:

\zeta^{u}(x) = \epsilon^{i}f^{u}_{i}-----i = 1,2,...,N,-----(1)

Where the \epsilon^{i} are the group parameters. Our basic requirement is that the commutator of two such infinitesimal mappings must again be of this form. We find for this commutator:

\zeta^{u}_{3} = (\epsilon^{i}_{2}\epsilon^{j}_{1}-\epsilon^{i}_{1}\epsilon^{j}_{2})f^{u}_{i,v}f^{v}_{j}-----(2)

In order that it be of the form (1) the functions f^{u}_{i} must be related to each other by an equation of the form:

f^{u}_{i,v}f^{v}_{j} = c^{k}_{ij}f^{u}_{k}-----(3)

Where the c^{k}_{ij}are constants independent of the \epsilon^{i} and the x^{u} .

they are called the structure constants of the group and serve to characterize it in

a manner that is independent of the particular form taken by the f^{u}_{i}.

If we substitute (3) back into (2) we obtain:

\zeta^{u}_{3} = (\epsilon^{i}_{2}\epsilon^{j}_{1}-\epsilon^{i}_{1}\epsilon^{j}_{2})c^{k}_{ij}f^{u}_{k}

So that the infinitesimal parameters \epsilon^{k}_{3} of the commutator are given by:

\epsilon^{k}_{3} = c^{k}_{ij}(\epsilon^{i}_{2}\epsilon^{j}_{1}-\epsilon^{i}_{1}\epsilon^{j}_{2})

From the manner of their construction we see that the structure constants
are antisymmetric in the two lower indices, that is,

c^{k}_{ij} = -c^{k}_{ji}

Thanks for any help in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It just follows from the definition. If you interchange i and j in the computation, you get a minus sign.
 
zhentil said:
It just follows from the definition. If you interchange i and j in the computation, you get a minus sign.

Can you show me then?

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K