STRUCTURE-FLUID interaction (and not the contrary) with Comsol

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the challenges of simulating fluid-structure interaction (FSI) in COMSOL Multiphysics, specifically when modeling an elastic diaphragm in a piping system. The user encountered issues with boundary conditions where the default settings did not allow the fluid to respond to solid displacements. By directly applying solid displacements, the model converged successfully, raising questions about dimensional consistency. Additionally, the user faced turbulence issues when applying pressure boundary conditions, leading to convergence problems at higher forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6 or later
  • Understanding of fluid-structure interaction (FSI) modeling
  • Knowledge of boundary condition settings in COMSOL
  • Familiarity with turbulence modeling techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "COMSOL Multiphysics pressure boundary conditions" for FSI applications
  • Explore "artificial diffusion" options in COMSOL for turbulent flow simulations
  • Learn about "COMSOL Multiphysics structural mechanics module" for gear simulations
  • Investigate "fluid-structure interaction convergence techniques" to improve model stability
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for engineers and researchers involved in fluid-structure interaction modeling, particularly those using COMSOL Multiphysics for complex simulations involving elastic materials and turbulent flows.

sunset451
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I've got a strange doubt.I model an elastic diaghfram that move water in piping system (a simple pump) so I've got used the 3D FSI multiphicis. Note that in Comsol's examples is the fluid that move the solid structure: i use the same procedure but for the opposite case.
I create a simple geometry with a thin elastic rectangular solid (the diaghpram) directly attached on a cube(the fluid subdomain). I set on solid fixed constrains on four laterals buondaries and a surface load on upper wall.

So I've found an absurd: if i leave the default setting on the boundary condition on the fluid-structure wall (that corrisponding at the "structural velocity" time derivates of solid displacements (ut,vt,wt) ) the fluid doesn't see the perturbation.
BUT if in the same field i set DIRECTLY the SOLID DISPLACEMENTS (u,v,w) the model works perfectly and it rapidly converge. BUT Dimensionally is an absurd, why it works? Please help me to understand.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
sunset451 said:
Hi,
I've got a strange doubt.I model an elastic diaghfram that move water in piping system (a simple pump) so I've got used the 3D FSI multiphicis. Note that in Comsol's examples is the fluid that move the solid structure: i use the same procedure but for the opposite case.
I create a simple geometry with a thin elastic rectangular solid (the diaghpram) directly attached on a cube(the fluid subdomain). I set on solid fixed constrains on four laterals buondaries and a surface load on upper wall.

So I've found an absurd: if i leave the default setting on the boundary condition on the fluid-structure wall (that corrisponding at the "structural velocity" time derivates of solid displacements (ut,vt,wt) ) the fluid doesn't see the perturbation.
BUT if in the same field i set DIRECTLY the SOLID DISPLACEMENTS (u,v,w) the model works perfectly and it rapidly converge. BUT Dimensionally is an absurd, why it works? Please help me to understand.

I was in error... for activate the fluid motion i set to the interface a pressure type boundary condition with (Tax_smsld,Tay_smsld,Taz_smsld)...so now the problem is that the fluid is strongly turbulent and the solution converge only for too small force applied to the diagphram... i need to understand the "artificial diffusion" options.please help me.
 
Hello my friend,

In my case I´m trying to simulate the flow paths of a gearbox with a pair of spur gears... Right now I´ve been trying to follow two directions... rotating machinery module on chemical engineering and fluid-structure interaction on Structural mechanics... works fine for chemical module but it will be difficult to simulate a gear pair with that approach... and on the last one I haven´t been able to simulate fluid movement due to the gears... Can you explain me if you could fix and get fluid movement due to a solid body?

Thanks in advance !
Jesus
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
14K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
19K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K