MHB Struggling to solve number pattern question Please help

  • Thread starter Thread starter yiannicart
  • Start date Start date
yiannicart
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am in my final year of Secondary Teaching, specialising in history and language, so mathematics isn't always my strong point.:p
I tutor middle school students for extra money, and am helping one through a number reasoning test.

The question is as follows:

The numbers in each of the three brackets follow the same rule. Find the missing number.
[19, 25, 3] [4, 26, 11] [?, 51, 9]

A. 20
B. 31
C. 33 (the correct answer)
D. 34I cannot seem to find how 33 is the correct answer (I only know via the answer book), let alone the rule/pattern the numbers are following. If anyone can explain this to me and shed some light on this, it would be extremely helpful for me and for my student.
Cheers,
Yianni :D
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi yiannicart and welcome to MHB! :D

It appears that the third number is half the difference between the first and second numbers:

(25 - 19)/2 = 3, (26 - 4)/2 = 11, (51 - 33)/2 = 9.
 
greg1313 said:
Hi yiannicart and welcome to MHB! :D

It appears that the third number is half the difference between the first and second numbers:

(25 - 19)/2 = 3, (26 - 4)/2 = 11, (51 - 33)/2 = 9.
Hi greg1313,
Thank you so much! This helps so much!
Kindest regards from Australia!
Yianni
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top