Struggling with Question: (n/3)^n < n < (n/2)^n for n > 5

  • Thread starter Thread starter rival95
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inequality (n/3)^n < n! < (n/2)^n for all integers n > 5 can be approached using logarithmic transformations and Stirling's approximation. The base case has been established, and the proof for P(k+1) involves demonstrating that the logarithmic form of the inequality holds true. Specifically, the logarithmic expressions simplify to -Log(3) < -1 < -Log(2), which is valid for sufficiently large n. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding Stirling's approximation and its applicability for integer values greater than 5.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with Stirling's approximation
  • Knowledge of logarithmic properties
  • Basic combinatorial mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Stirling's approximation in combinatorial proofs
  • Learn about logarithmic inequalities and their implications in mathematical proofs
  • Explore advanced topics in mathematical induction techniques
  • Investigate the convergence of sequences and series related to factorial growth
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students tackling combinatorial inequalities, and educators looking for proof strategies in advanced mathematics.

rival95
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Trying to solve a question, but having a hard time starting it.

Question:
(n/3)^n < n! < (n/2)^n ; all integers n > 5

I proved the base case already and made the assumption of P(k) and am having difficulty knowing where to start on my proof of:

P(k+1): ( (k+1)/3)^k+1 < (k+1)! < ( (k+1)/2)^k+1

any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a possible method that is not induction:

(n/2)^n > 1 for n > 2.
(n/3)^n > 1 for n > 3.

So for n > 3 we can take the Log of the inequality.
Log((n/3)^n) < Log(n!) < Log((n/2)^n)

For n large enough (to be determined) we can use Stirling's approximation
Log(n!) ~ (-1 + Log(n)) n + O(1)

Then cancel out the common (positive) factor of n in the inequality and remove the Log(n) term from each side to get
-Log(3) < -1 < -Log(2)
which is true.

All that remains to be shown is that Stirling's approximation is good enough for integer n>5.
 
Last edited:
Actually, a proof by induction is not too hard either.
But as this is your first post to these forums I suspect it's a homework problem.
So I won't give you the proof yet.

I found it by starting with the n+1 inequality:
((n + 1)/3)^(n + 1) < (n + 1)! < ((n + 1)/2)^(n + 1)
and noting that it implies
1/3 ((n + 1)/n)^n (n/3)^n < n! < 1/2 ((n + 1)/n)^n (n/2)^n

Now you just need to play with the ((n + 1)/n)^n factors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K