Strut Braced Wings: Advantages, Disadvantages & Commercial Use

  • Thread starter Thread starter lucy_b14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wings
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the advantages and disadvantages of strut braced wings in fixed wing aircraft, particularly in the context of their commercial use and historical development. Participants explore the technical implications, performance factors, and reasons for limited adoption in large commercial aircraft.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that strut braced wings could allow for the use of less or inferior materials for wing spars, potentially reducing weight.
  • Others argue that struts introduce increased drag, complexity in construction, and potential structural failures, which are significant concerns for commercial aviation.
  • One participant notes that early aircraft utilized strut braced wings due to the belief that thin wings were more efficient, but later developments showed that thicker wings are more effective for lift.
  • Another participant mentions that research indicates strut braced wings could lead to significant savings in operating costs and fuel efficiency for modern airliners, citing studies from Virginia Tech University.
  • Concerns are raised about interference drag caused by poorly designed struts and the need for struts to handle both tension and compression during different flight conditions.
  • Some participants highlight that strut bracing is more suitable for high wing aircraft, which limits its application in most commercial airliners.
  • A later reply references ongoing research by Boeing into the potential future use of strut braced wings in commercial aviation, indicating a long-term interest in the concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the advantages and disadvantages of strut braced wings, with no clear consensus on their viability for large commercial aircraft. Multiple competing perspectives on their effectiveness and practicality remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various technical challenges, such as drag considerations and structural integrity under different flight conditions, but do not resolve these issues. The discussion reflects a mix of historical context and modern research without definitive conclusions.

lucy_b14
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi

Does anyone know the main advantages and disadvantages of strut braced wings on fixed wing aircraft, and why they are not used for any large commercial planes these days (as far as i know!)?

Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I can't really think of any advantages to running struts. I guess if you used struts you could use less/inferior materials for wing spars. The struts will have disadvantages of increased drag, complexity of building and they tend to break. Drag and strength would be a huge issue for a commercial aircraft. Really, there is no need to use struts with modern materials and designs in place.
 
The benefit would be that you could make stronger wings with less materials - so they'd be lighter. But as Fred was saying, lift/drag ratio is a (or the) critical factor in airplane performance.
 
Early aircraft had strut wings because engineers believed that thin wings promoted lift. Due to the especially thin design of the wing their was not enough internal room for adequate bracing for a wing span wide enough to carry the load, so they made two shorter wing with external bracing. As technology developed engineers discovered a thicker wing actually was more efficient making lift. This discovery was before air transportation was reliable and safe enough to be viable.
 
Strut braced wings are a reasonably new idea 'in the transonic airline world, although the idea is not a new one in general aviation and they were intitially used by early aircraft designers around the Wright brother's time on thin wings before the realisation that thicker cambered airfoils generated more lift at subsonic speeds due to induced circulation characteristics as said by the previous chap.' They've mainly been researched by Virginia Tech University (USA). Google their technical papers.

Advantages
The savings can be unbelievable on modern config airliners. 20% direct operating costs, 20% reduced specific fuel burn etc etc all on simulated mission proposals for boeing aircraft flying standard medium haul routes with built in strut brace.

Disadvantages/problems
The strut can cause massive interferance drag if badly designed. There is a paper into the for a Boeing 737 flying at 0.85 mach where the guy came up with formulas to predict the drag based on the strut connection angle at the wing. He concluded a perpendicular connection was best.

The strut must also not just deal with tension when aircraft is in cruise, but also compression of wing when it is on ground fully fueled. Various designs have been proposed within strut structures to deal with this.

Why haven't most airline manufacturers not jumped at the opportunity to put them on aircraft I hear you ask? The answer is strut bracing is only good for high wing aircraft (as strut is in tension during cruise = better for structural stability). Not many airliners have high wing aircraft. Companies such as cessna have experimented with struts however and been rather successful.

ps if you find information about the 'folding joints' necessary for strut braces in compression situations (such as the -2g taxi bump requirement) could you let me know?.
 
Last edited:
I got my information from a episode of Wings on the History channel. I guess their historians and virtually unlimited resource of technical data and aeronautical engineering advisor's are wrong.
 
Strut braced wings maybe coming to a comercial airplane near you . . . well in 25 years.

"With its Development of Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research Project, Boeing Phantom Works—along with Boeing Commercial Airplanes, . . . — will evaluate the performance of these concepts with regard to noise, emissions, take-off field length, fuel use and energy utilization. "

http://www.aeronautics.nasa.gov/nra_awardees_10_06_08_f.htm"
 

Attachments

  • awardee_subsonic_ultragreen_lg.jpg
    awardee_subsonic_ultragreen_lg.jpg
    12.1 KB · Views: 1,861
Last edited by a moderator:
A look at the concepts Boeing submitted to NASA for tomorrow's airplanes

http://pw-mct-epw-app3.nw.nos.boeing.com/Public/EOTNewsNow/Story.aspx?StoryID=2119"

[PLAIN]http://pw-mct-epw-app3.nw.nos.boeing.com/public/EOTNewsNow/Images/2119G266.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K