MHB Stuck on a Problem? Get Some Helpful Hints!

  • Thread starter Thread starter veronica1999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stuck
veronica1999
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I have been working on this problem for a while and I am stuck,
Can I get some hints pls?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • 10bb.jpg
    10bb.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 89
Mathematics news on Phys.org
veronica1999 said:
I have been working on this problem for a while and I am stuck,
Can I get some hints pls?

Thanks.
Can two of the $a_i's$ be equal?
 
I don't think so because the answer is (b) 512.
 
veronica1999 said:
I have been working on this problem for a while and I am stuck,
Can I get some hints pls?

Thanks.

Hi veronica1999, :)

The number 1 should appear somewhere in the list. If 1 is the first number on the list, the list can only be written in one particular way under the given criteria. That is, \((1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)\).

Suppose 1 appear at the \(k^{\mbox{th}}\) position of the list where \(k\neq 1\). Then 2 should precede 1. If 2 is not the 1st number, 3 should precede 2 and so on. Further suppose that \(n\) is the 1st number on the list and \(m\) be the maximum number that precedes 1. If \(m\) is not in the first position of the list(that is \(n\neq m\)) then \(m-1\) should precede \(m\), if \(m-1\) is not in the first position \(m-2\) should precede \(m-1\) and so on. This continues until \(m-i=n\) for some \(i=1,2,\cdots,m-2\). Therefore, \(k=m\).

In other words if you have 1 at the \(k^{\mbox{th}}\) position you have all the numbers upto \(k-1\) preceding 1.

Also you can see that according to the given criteria if \(k\neq 10\) number at the \((k+1)^\mbox{th}\) position should be, \(k+1\). If \(k+1\neq 10\) then the number at the \((k+2)^\mbox{th}\) position should be \(k+2\) and so on. This continues until \(k+j=10\) for some \(j=0,2,\cdots,8\).

So we only have to count the number of arrangements that could be made by the numbers that precedes 1. This is the number of arrangements that could be made from the situation where 1 is at the \(k^\mbox{th}\) position.

Also it can be seen according to the above discussion that, 2 or \(k\) should be at the \((k-1)^\mbox{th}\) position of the list.

Case 1: If \(k\) is at the \((k-1)^\mbox{th}\) position of the list then 2 or \(k-1\) should be at the \((k-2)^\mbox{th}\) position of the list.

Case 2: If \(2\) is at the \((k-1)^\mbox{th}\) position of the list then 3 or \(k\) should be at the \((k-2)^\mbox{th}\) position of the list.

Arguing in a similar fashion we can see that, every position before the \(k^\mbox{th}\) position up to the 2nd position can have two different values. Finally the remaining number can be put into the first position.

Therefore the number of arrangements when 1 is at the \(k^\mbox{th}\) position is, \(2^{k-2}\) where \(k=2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10\).

Summary:


1) If 1is the first number on the list\((k=1)\), then the list can be arranged in one way. That is, \((1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)\).

2) There are \(2^{k-2}\) lists with 1 at the \(k^\mbox{th}\) position where \(k=2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10\).

Therefore the total Number of arrangements\( = 1+2^0+2^1+2^2+2^3+\cdots+2^8=512\)

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top