Studying Is Studying String Theory Worthwhile for a Future in Theoretical Physics?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the value of pursuing string theory within the field of theoretical physics. A student expresses concern about whether focusing on string theory is worthwhile, given that peers consider it a waste of time. Responses highlight that while string theory may face criticisms regarding stagnation and lack of breakthroughs, many academics encourage its study due to its contributions to mathematics and theoretical physics. The importance of personal interest and curiosity in the subject is emphasized, suggesting that if the student finds value in string theory, it may not be a waste of time for them. Additionally, practical considerations regarding employment opportunities in string theory are raised, prompting the student to reflect on their career goals and the job market for physicists specializing in this area. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the balance between personal passion and practical career considerations in academic research.
BolitaKini
Hello, I am studing theoretical physics and i would like to focus my work in string theory, but my fellows say that is a waste of time. ¿Do you think that is worthwhile to spend my time and effort un string theory?
Greetings
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So I'm not sure who you mean by "fellows" but I'm not sure anyone is really in a position to call it a waste of time.

I have just recently begun my MSc in Theoretical Physics and I also wanted to learn about String Theory. I have had my own concerns about whether it is a worthwhile focus for my PhD or future research, you hear a lot about how the field is stagnating and there hasn't been any major breakthroughs in some time.

Especially whilst picking a project for my dissertation I've had the pleasure of discussing String Theory with a fair few academics, none of whom's research is in the field of String Theory, some of whom work on quantum gravity, every one of them told me if I was interested in String Theory I should absolutely go for it and it is in no way a waste of time.

I think in order to see the value of research in String Theory one needs to think of it as so much more than a theory of quantum gravity, or even a theory of everything, what it has already done for the development of mathematics and what it could continue to do is more than enough for me to say its not a waste of time.

Maybe a more important question than is it a waste of time might be is it a waste of your time? if you find it interesting and it satisfies whatever curiosity you have as a Physicist then I would imagine the answer is no?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BolitaKini said:
Hello, I am studing theoretical physics and i would like to focus my work in string theory, but my fellows say that is a waste of time. ¿Do you think that is worthwhile to spend my time and effort un string theory?
Greetings

You may study anything you want, but the question is, what do you want to DO with it?

Inevitably, the question EMPLOYMENT (remember that?) comes into play. So where in the world are you, or where in the world do you intend to seek employment after you graduate? What are the employment rate there of not only physics degree holders, but also degree holders having an expertise in THAT area that you want to specialize in? What are the odds that you will find someone or some institution that will pay you money to continue your work in string theory?

Rather than asking if it is a "waste of time", which really is subjective, ask these questions that I've asked you and ponder the possible answers.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes ISamson and Demystifier
I'm studing a MSc in theoretical physics, i had to choose a subject for my final project, i asked the question because it is linked with a future PhD, finally i chose the AdS/CFT correspondance. Thanks for your time.
 
BolitaKini said:
I'm studing a MSc in theoretical physics, i had to choose a subject for my final project, i asked the question because it is linked with a future PhD, finally i chose the AdS/CFT correspondance. Thanks for your time.

Just to point out something in case you missed it, but you didn't even address the issues that I brought up.

Zz.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
589
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
655
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K