Subalgebras of nipotent algebras

  • Thread starter Thread starter jostpuur
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
A finite-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebra \mathfrak{g} has a subalgebra \mathfrak{h} with one dimension less. If \mathfrak{g}_1=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}] has codimension one, it can be chosen directly; otherwise, arbitrary vectors can be added to form \mathfrak{h}. The discussion explores whether a similar subalgebra can exist without the nilpotency condition, relying on the property that all elements are nilpotent. It is noted that if each element is nilpotent, it is also ad-nilpotent, leading to Engel's theorem, which states that such algebras are nilpotent. The construction of \mathfrak{h} remains valid regardless of the algebra's properties, as long as \mathfrak{g} has a proper subalgebra.
jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
I know that if \mathfrak{g} is a finite dimensional nilpotent Lie algebra, then a subalgebra \mathfrak{h} with precisely one dimension less exists.

If \mathfrak{g}_1=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}] has the codimension of one, then choose it. If instead
\textrm{dim}(\mathfrak{g})-\textrm{dim}(\mathfrak{g}_1)=n>1,
then add some arbitrary vectors to it like this
<br /> \mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{g}_1\oplus X_1\oplus\cdots\oplus X_{n-1}<br />
and this is a subalgebra since
<br /> [\mathfrak{h},\mathfrak{h}]\subset [\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]=\mathfrak{g}_1\subset \mathfrak{h}.<br />

My question is, that is it possible to easily prove that such subalgebra with codimension of one exists also, if we don't know the nilpotency of the algebra, but instead only know that each element of the algebra is nilpotent, so that X^n=0 for all X\in\mathfrak{g} for some n.

This should be true, because it can be shown that if an element is nilpotent, it is also ad-nilpotent, and the Engel's theorem says, that if each element of the Lie algebra is ad-nilpotent, then the algebra is nilpotent too. However, I'm now struggling with the proof of the Engel's theorem, so I would like some other way.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you already have proven it. Your construction works regardless of any properties of the Lie algebra. Since ##\mathfrak{g}/[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]## is Abelian, you only needed that ##[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]\subsetneq \mathfrak{g}## is a proper subalgebra. Such a subalgebra is even an ideal.

Only if ##[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]=\mathfrak{g}## as e.g. for semisimple Lie algebras we get empty statements which are trivially true, but the construction always yields the entire Lie algebra.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
903
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K