Substates don't evolve according to Schroedinger equation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rodsika
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evolution of substates in quantum systems, specifically addressing the assertion by Ken G that substates do not evolve according to the Schrödinger equation. He argues that when components like electrons and photons are coupled, they form a combined system where the individual substates cannot be treated as pure states. Instead, they evolve into mixed states, losing their ability to be described by unitary evolution, particularly in the case of the Schrödinger's Cat thought experiment. The conversation also touches on the implications of this behavior in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to decoherence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly the Schrödinger equation.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of pure states and mixed states in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of quantum entanglement and its implications on state evolution.
  • Basic grasp of Hamiltonians and their role in quantum state evolution.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of quantum decoherence and its effects on state evolution.
  • Study the implications of mixed states in quantum mechanics and their measurement outcomes.
  • Explore the role of Hamiltonians in quantum systems, particularly in relation to entangled states.
  • Investigate the Schrödinger's Cat paradox and its relevance to quantum state interpretation.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the foundations of quantum theory and the behavior of quantum systems under coupling and entanglement.

rodsika
Messages
278
Reaction score
2
In the thread "Does Schrödinger's Cat Paradox Suck?" in message #116:

Ken G stated:

"But that's what I'm saying isn't true-- even if we start with pure states for each component of the system, when we couple them, the only pure state is now a combined system. The cat is now a substate of that system, and substates don't evolve according to the Shroedinger equation, so they don't evolve unitarily and they don't become superposition states. There is really no such thing as the state of a part of a system, but we as physicists can make correct predictions by using the concept of a mixed state to treat such substates, or in some special circumstances, we have enough information to treat a substate as a pure or superposition state. That ability is quickly lost for the cat in the box, even if it starts out in an impossible-to-know pure state."

Let's take a simpler example of a group of of electrons and photons. Ken said that if we start with pure states for each component of the system (of say electrons and photons), when we couple them, the only pure state is now a combined system. The electrons are now a substate of that system, and substates don't evolve according to the Shroedinger equation. Is this true?? Since they are all pure state. How can the substate be no longer in pure state? Hope someone else beside Ken G can confirm or refute this. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is a simple example.

Consider two spins, 1 and 2, in a triplet state of the form [tex]a_1 |+ + \rangle + a_0 \left(\frac{|+ - \rangle + | - + \rangle}{\sqrt{2}} \right) + a_{-1} | - - \rangle[/tex]. Let the Hamiltonian be a simple magnetic field in the x direction [tex]H = - g B (S_1^x + S_2^x)[/tex]

Under the action of this Hamiltonian the initially unentangled state [tex]|+ + \rangle[/tex] will evolve into a general entangled state like I wrote above. In other words, the spin will precess around the x axis.

From the point of view of spin 1, it begins life in a pure state but later evolves into a mixed state (and later still becomes a pure state again). Thus the evolution of spin 1 cannot be described by unitary evolution. This is true even though the whole system continues to evolve unitarily.

Hope this helps.
 
Physics Monkey said:
Here is a simple example.

Consider two spins, 1 and 2, in a triplet state of the form [tex]a_1 |+ + \rangle + a_0 \left(\frac{|+ - \rangle + | - + \rangle}{\sqrt{2}} \right) + a_{-1} | - - \rangle[/tex]. Let the Hamiltonian be a simple magnetic field in the x direction [tex]H = - g B (S_1^x + S_2^x)[/tex]

Under the action of this Hamiltonian the initially unentangled state [tex]|+ + \rangle[/tex] will evolve into a general entangled state like I wrote above. In other words, the spin will precess around the x axis.

From the point of view of spin 1, it begins life in a pure state but later evolves into a mixed state (and later still becomes a pure state again). Thus the evolution of spin 1 cannot be described by unitary evolution. This is true even though the whole system continues to evolve unitarily.

Hope this helps.

Thanks. Is this related to decoherence?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K