Sugar Mixture: Eutectic Potential and Effects

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phrak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixture Sugar
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the eutectic potential of sugar mixtures, specifically questioning whether sugars can form a eutectic system. Participants clarify that eutectics occur when two substances are not miscible in all proportions in their solid state. The conversation references the tin-lead and copper-nickel systems as examples of eutectic and non-eutectic behavior, respectively. It concludes that while sugars may exhibit complex behaviors due to their various configurations, the determination of their eutectic potential remains unclear.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eutectic systems and phase diagrams
  • Familiarity with solid solutions and miscibility concepts
  • Basic knowledge of sugar chemistry, including configurations like alpha and beta aldoses
  • Awareness of physical chemistry principles, particularly related to melting points and decomposition
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the eutectic behavior of sugar mixtures and their phase diagrams
  • Study the differences between solid solutions and miscibility in solid phases
  • Examine the melting point determination methods for various sugars
  • Explore the implications of crystalline structures in eutectic systems
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, food scientists, and anyone interested in the physical chemistry of sugar mixtures and their applications in food products.

Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7
Does a mixture of sugars have a Eutectic?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I don't know the answer to this one, but my first guess would be no they are miscible in all proportions, since there are many commercial mixtures of treacle and syrup out there.
Toffee and fudge, of course, contain water and fat as well.
 
Studiot said:
I don't know the answer to this one, but my first guess would be no they are miscible in all proportions, since there are many commercial mixtures of treacle and syrup out there.
Toffee and fudge, of course, contain water and fat as well.

A eutectic is a mimum where the temperature of solidification from the liquid phase is least for different proportions of two compounds. The example I'm familiar with is lead and tin. I imagine two missible liquids like water and ethanol will also have a eutectic, or two different sugars like lactose and dextrose as well, though I really don't know.
 
I know what a eutectic is.

You do not get eutectics when the two substances are miscible in all proportions.
 
Studiot said:
I know what a eutectic is.

You do not get eutectics when the two substances are miscible in all proportions.

Only if they are miscible in all proportions in the solid state. I don't know whether this is true for sugars. Furthermore, the determination of the melting point for sugars is quite a mess as they tend to exist in various configurations (alpha and beta aldoles, dimers ...) and for many sugars the melting cannot be separated from decomposition.
 
I don't know what ya'all are talking about, Studiot. You can't even separate lead and tin into regions of solid state and liquid state but must include two others. There are regions on the ratio vs. temperature graph that are mixtures of both solid and liquid phase.

Lead and Tin have a Eutectic, they are missible in all proportions at the temperature above that of solidification of the maxima of both Lead or Tin.

...I just wanted to know how the manufactures of Pop Rocks decided to mix 3 sugars together to make their product successful...
 
Last edited:
I don't know what ya'all are talking about, Studiot

Here are sketches of two phase diagrams to clarify matters. One is the tin-lead system the other is the copper-nickel system.

As you rightly observe the tin-lead system has a eutectic point at 36% lead.
This is because liquid tin and liquid lead are miscible in all proportions, but solid tin and solid lead are not. That is they cannot form a solid solution because their lattices are incompatible. So any solid is a mixture of solid tin + solid lead.

On the other hand copper and nickel are miscible in all proportions in both the liquid and solid state so form an alloy at any composition in the solid. There is no eutectic in the phase diagram. The freezing and melting lines are different, as required by the phase rule.

I am sorry I have no such information for sugars.
 

Attachments

  • phasediags.jpg
    phasediags.jpg
    12.1 KB · Views: 644
Studiot said:
Here are sketches of two phase diagrams to clarify matters. One is the tin-lead system the other is the copper-nickel system.

As you rightly observe the tin-lead system has a eutectic point at 36% lead.
This is because liquid tin and liquid lead are miscible in all proportions, but solid tin and solid lead are not. That is they cannot form a solid solution because their lattices are incompatible. So any solid is a mixture of solid tin + solid lead.

On the other hand copper and nickel are miscible in all proportions in both the liquid and solid state so form an alloy at any composition in the solid. There is no eutectic in the phase diagram. The freezing and melting lines are different, as required by the phase rule.

I am sorry I have no such information for sugars.

Interesting. I'd forgotten about crystaline structures that can contain a pair of elements in any proportion. Is the term missible really used to talk about solid phases? This is unfamiliar to me.
Also we can have amorphous, or semi-amorphous solid states to further confuse the issue.

Equally, I hadn't considered that there may not be a eutectic minum between two or more compounds.

Thanks for the help.
 
Is the term missible really used to talk about solid phases?

Perhaps not often since miscible really implies that you can add one to the other and stir. Solid solution is more often used. There is more than one type of solid solution. Substitutional as in the case of cupro-nickel system and insterstitial as in the case of carbon and iron.

Some of the data came from what is IHMO the best Physical Chemistry text ever written,
Physical Chemistry by Moore.
He has a good chapter or three on this stuff.

go well
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K